Archive for category Film
film review: Gran Torino
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on December 23, 2008
Clint Eastwood directs himself in this film (with a screenplay by Nick Schenk) about an angry Korean War veteran, Walt Kowalski, living in Michigan. The film opens to a funeral scene for Walt’s wife. He growls and grunts as he watches his grand-children entering the church wearing belly-piercings and football jerseys. The strained relationships with his sons and their families are transparent at the gathering post funeral. Later, a young priest, who befriended Walt’s wife, keeps coming around to visit Walt. Walt calls him an “overeducated 27-year-old virgin.” Walt enjoys sitting on his front porch with a cooler of beers, his dog at his side, watching the cars go by. He’s not happy that his neighborhood has turned “ethnic” but he refuses to leave. In his spare time he heads to the VFW to hang with his buddies where they knock a few back and joke around, using all sorts of ethnic slurs in the name of good fun.
What begins as somewhat of a Dirty Harry caricature turns endearing as he bonds with his Hmong neighbors. Though initially he calls them every derogatory name possible and yells at them to stay off his lawn, he cannot help but become enmeshed in their lives. Walt is happy with his insular life until a gang rolls up and comes a bit to close to his house. And then worse, to his prized possession: his mint 1972 Gran Torino. When he sees the daughter, Sue [the delightful and spirited Ahney Her], being harassed out on the street, he drives up and scares some boys away and the two become unlikely friends. He begins to enjoy the companionship of Sue and her relatives. He declares he has more in common with them than “his spoiled family.” The clash of cultures has funny and touching moments. The shared moments with Sue, Thao and their family awakens in Walt something that may have been lost a long time ago. He mentors the young boy of the family, Thao [played honestly and even-tempered by Bee Vang]. He treats him like a son and teaches him to fix things and use tools and get a job as a construction worker. Then heroically, ingeniously saves him from a gang. It’s a heartwarming film that I highly recommend.
STEELE SAYS: SEE IT IN THE THEATRE
film review: Milk
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on December 10, 2008
When gay rights continue to be threatened today, a film about a 1970s gay rights pioneer is important to see. Unfortunately it will not reach the audiences that it needs to reach most. Here in Massachusetts, we have gay marriage. In California, where Harvey Milk fought for gay rights so ardently, gays have had their civil rights taken away and now are fighting Prop 8 (the recent vote against gay marriage). This should be merely a historical film but it cuts into today’s political climate as much now as it did then. It saddens me. I saw the film with my close friend who happens to be gay. We saw it in liberal Brookline at the Coolidge Corner theatre. During classes we took together there was an early undercurrent of “is he or isn’t he gay?” and I just don’t see why this type of discussion still exists or needs to exist today. Why does who someone chooses to have sex with really matter in the end? More importantly, why should society and the government care so much?
At 40-years-old, Harvey Milk lamented that he hadn’t done anything with his life and after looking around his neighborhood and realizing he had a chance to make a difference, he threw himself into politics. He vigilantly worked against many against many anti-gay initiatives. His effervescent personality, resiliency and perseverance (he ran for office four times) paid off when he finally became elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and the first openly gay elected politician, in 1977. Everyone seemed to like him and he developed a huge grassroots following. During his short time in office, he managed to pass a major gay rights ordinance for San Francisco. Milk and Mayor George Moscone were assassinated by disgruntled former San Francisco supervisor Dan White.
Sean Penn [The Interpreter, Mystic River] portrays Milk in a powerful, profound, commanding performance and will most likely be nominated for an Academy award. He is ebullient and convicted to the end result and wins you over from the first frame. He makes you love Milk right off. He also makes you feel like you are watching a documentary at times. He has the mannerisms and affectations down. And when he’s with his lover, played by the talented James Franco [Pineapple Express, Spider-Man 3], the sex appeal oozes. The duo has smoldering and intense chemistry. James Brolin [W, No Country for Old Men] as Dan White and Emile Hirsch [Into the Wild] as Milk’s protege Cleve Jones, are outstanding as well. First-time screenwriter Dustin Lance Black weaves a compelling script, while director Gus Van Sant [Elephant, Good Will Hunting] scores another convincing, provocative film that delves into a difficult, emotional subject.
Milk is a moving, inspirational film. The gay rights movement, starting around 1970, piggybacked on the civil rights movement, and is equally as historical. Though there are not as many big names attached to the movement or memorable speeches or seminal/blood shed moments. Being openly gay and advancing the rights of gays not only in California but throughout the country by making people realize that being gay wasn’t something that should hold them back or allow them to be discriminated against. He created legislature against such discrimination. Harvey Milk began every speech saying, “My name is Harvey Milk and I’m here to recruit you.” He had a “platform”, so to speak,” of getting people to come out to their families, friends, and co-workers. That is his legacy. 
Dubbing himself the Mayor of Castro Street, Milk had charisma. He declared that it was “not just issues. This is our lives we are fighting for.” And that it was never just gay rights but human rights. Harvey Milk understood the big picture long before others did and longer before many more will.
–Amy Steele [12.10.2008]
STEELE SAYS: SEE IT IN THE THEATRE
RIP Paul Newman(1925-2008)
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on September 27, 2008
Get Smart: Why can’t the female lead be older?
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on June 25, 2008
I know this is something that has been going on forever, the 40-something guy in a film is paired with a 20-something girl.
Steve Carrell, who has extended his Office character way too far at this point, did a decent job here as Maxwell Smart. Anne Hathaway plays Agent 99 and she does a great job. I like Anne Hathaway. Liked her in Brokeback Mountain, Becoming Jane, The Devil Wears Prada and The Princess Diaries. But I want to see more women over 30 getting more roles.
If I were casting, I might consider these women for the role of 99:
1. Rachel Weisz
2. Thandie Newton 
3. Angie Harmon
4. Elizabeth Hurley
5. Portia DeRossi
6. Kate Beckinsale
7. Ashley Judd
film review: War Inc.
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on June 13, 2008
“It’s the first war outsouced to private enterprises.”
This ironic, savvy political satire is set in Turaqistan, a country occupied by an American private corporation, Tamerlane, run by a former US Vice-President (Dan Aykroyd). John Cusack plays a hitman, a character not unlike that in one of my favorite Cusack films (mainly for the nostalgia of my high school class) Grosse Pointe Blank (a film he also co-wrote). His dry, sarcastic, breathy, rapid fire delivery is there as well as his dissatisfaction with his career choice. He seems to thrive on playing conflicted hitmen. In another war related film earlier this year, he wasn’t as strong as a widower whose wife died in Iraq in Grace is Gone).
Brand Hauser (Cusack) gets an assignment to kill the oil minister because his plan to build a pipeline will ruin the plans of Tamerlane, the company that controls every aspect of this country. As a cover, Hauser will run a trade fair in the Green Zone (aka Emerald City) that highlights capatilstic delights and features the marriage of pop star Yonica Babyyeah (Hilary Duff) to the son of the Emerit.
This ironic, savvy political satire is set in Turaqistan, a country occupied by an American private corporation run by a former US Vice-President (Dan Aykroyd). In this Muslim Country, America is welcomed in tongue-in-cheek manner with American style diners, a Jack in the Box restaurant and shameless advertising. The details are brilliant: the battered looking villagers are wearing crocs! The military hummers have advertisements on them, like taxi cabs. An erratic zealot dispatches Cusack to kill a leader in Turaquistan and he really does not want to be there. He meets a liberal, sexy journalist (Marissa Tomei) and tries to help the Arab pop star version of Britney Spears. 
Everything gets outsourced. The spread of commercialism throughout the war is on full display. There’s money in war which I think anyone who’s ever seen a 60 Minutespiece on security or the “re-building” of Iraq knows. War Inc. possesses an absurdity but also so many layers and clear thinking about the consequences of our actions on a global and national scale. It’s obvious in its anti-war stance but in a clever, entertaining manner.
We all love John Cusack. Any Gen Xer does and he succeeds in this outrageous, provocative film. Marissa Tomei has chosen some fantastic roles of late (Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead) and I admire her for not relegating herself to the over 35-year-old mom roles. Joan Cusack plays a raving, over-the-top, eyes bulging, blabbering (saying everything we are thinking) assistant who cannot get out of this awful country fast enough.
Rated R, in limited release.
Just Like Bad Sex, SATC: The Movie Left Me Empty and Disappointed
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on June 1, 2008

This film was directed and written by a man, Michael Patrick King, and it’s supposed to be representative of women? Yikes! It’s like the former SATC writer having such success and being on Oprah with his book “He’s Not that Into You.” It’s because as women, we have to realize that there is something wrong with us that we are single after a certain age. I speak to my therapist about it all the time. It’s unfortunate.
It’s okay to be over 35 without a boyfriend or husband but Hollywood does not want to show that of course and people don’t want to see it. Why else would people dress up to see this film and go get cosmos and make a whole girls night out when they don’t see another film for months at a time (in the theater)? I could go on and on but I won’t. Hey, it happens. Do I always want to be alone? Not really. Would I like to have sex 4-5x/week. Absolutely. Did I think I would be turning 39 without a boyfriend? Never.
SATC: The movie was predictable and pathetic with few laughs or witty moments. There are moments here and there that are worth seeing but it’s really just an extremely long episode of a half hour sitcom. The one-liners fall flat. There’s little creativity. The highlight of the film are the outfits. I commented more than once on a dress or bag I liked.
I enjoyed the television show and was a fan– what I appreciated was that Carrie did not end up with the guy and the ring at the end. When I heard about the movie and that there would be a wedding I expected mediocrity which is what this film is.
But the film and show has always been about Carrie Bradshaw and her thoughts on dating and mating: she’s always been in search of the guy and her happy ending. She made it seem like she’s doing it independently but when you’re always writing about sex and dating and reading magazines and shopping and coveting shoes of all things, it’s hard for any guy to look at you and say: “Wow that Carrie is independent.” There was an episode once where Carrie needed to buy her apartment and Miranda pointed out that she probably could have purchased it with the amount of money she spent on shoes (as most of her shoes cost at least $400/pair). Charlotte ended up helping Carrie out. 
Four years after the series ended and all the girls are happily settled. Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) and Steve live in Brooklyn. She still treats him like crap and bitches about how much work she has to do and also has to take care of their son. Charlotte (Kristin Davis) is married and a full-time mom as she’s always wanted to be. Her husband, Harry (Evan Handler) is decicedly cool. Charlotte’s constant companion is her three-year-old adopted Chinese daughter Lily. The girl is like a prop. Can’t Charlotte do anything without her? She’s wealthy and must have a nanny. Miranda has a nanny for Brady. Samantha (Kim Cattrell) is on the Left Coast managing the career of Smith. He loves her, she loves him but as she says quite astutely “I love you but I love me more.” She finally realizes she cannot have her life revolving around a guy. Then there’s Carrie who thinks her life does not revolve around a guy but it actually does. She has managed to write three books about dating and love.
Big buys an amazing penthouse so that he and Carrie live there together and she freaks out. Now, I have nothing of my own to fall back on. There’s the bitter split of a mistress and her beau and the Christie’s auction at the beginning to show that women need to get married to protect themselves financially. Big makes a casual marriage proposal which Carrie finds rather cool. 
Then suddenly it’s snowballing into an enormous event and then Big is Big and he bails. There’s the Page Six announcement and then Carrie’s spread as
“the face of 40” in Vogue and also Big’s realization that on his third marriage he’d rather not have a big blowout. Carrie and friends recoup down in Mexico. Carrie takes to bed for days. And yes, after a breakup one might collapse for a while. But Big has done this so many times to Carrie that who didn’t predict this from the first mention of a betrothal? Everything works out in the end with Carrie and Big marrying at City Hall with Carrie wearing an vintage off-white suit and not the elaborate Vivienne Westwood gown. Kisses and cosmos all around.
Oh, and the friend a went with? A 46-year-old single mom of two, said she nearly cried a few times because the movie made her (and women in general) feel they may never find love over a certain age yada yada. Kudos to Sarah Jessica Parker and Michael Patrick King for making tons of money with this tripe.
Sex and the City: the movie is like putting on a pair of fabulous Chanel gladiator sandals without getting a pedicure. There’s just something amiss. Sure there’s mild entertainment scattered throughout. It’s fluff: empty calories.
STEELE RECOMMENDATION: WAIT FOR NETFLIX (IF YOU’RE A FAN, YOU’VE ALREADY SEEN IT)
RIP Sydney Pollack
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on May 27, 2008

Academy-award-winning director Sydney Pollack has died of cancer at age 73 at his home in Pacific Pallisades, according to Variety. The actor, director and producer had cancer. He was 73. He most recently appeared in Michael Clayton and Made of Honor. Pollack directed many films such as The Way We Were, Absence of Malice, Tootsie, Out of Africa and The Firm.
film review: Stop Loss
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on May 12, 2008
One of the guys in Stop Loss, just back from Iraq and out drinking with some friends says what many Americans are probably thinking: “All we need to do is drop a bomb instead of this urban combat bullshit.” Stop Loss tries very hard to show all the emotional distress this war has caused for those fighting and those at home.
The film opens in Iraq with an attack on a check point, a chase, and guns, bombs and blood… The frenzied cameras, gritty cinematography provide the adrenaline and also serve to provide the background story for the main characters in Stop Loss. The boys are soon home for a leave. Back in Texas where a parade welcomes them home.
Brandon [introspective and handsome, without being a pretty boy Ryan Phillippe] receives a purple heart. He’s happy because he’s out. He’s been the squad sergeant and everyone looks to him to lead the group and keep everyone on target and together. He served his duty and did his job. He went to Iraq after 9/11 for all the right reasons and now he’s disillusioned by the carnage he’s witnessed in the Middle East. After being told of his stop loss order, Brandon soon goes AWOL with the foolish plan to visit a U.S. Senator who told him to “drop by Washington if you ever need anything.” The themes of this film can only work in a state like Texas where so many are invoved in the military. In Massachusetts, for instance, there are no parades. Tommy (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) drinks a lot and cries quite a bit but desperately wants to stay in the military, despite his conflicted thoughts. And Steve (Channing Tatum) is the Hoo-rah, all or nothing, lifer. Although he has a quick flip out when he gets back where he fights with his girlfriend Michelle (Abbie Cornish) and digs a foxhole and spends the night in it fully armed and in his underwear. The three boys are the id, ego and superego for the war in Iraq. Tommy is the id, Steve is the ego and Brandon is the superego. Each guy’s story could really be a separate film.
It’s complicated and innerving to return from a war where when you left you knew, beyond a doubt, why you were fighting and for what and for whom. On return to have that sense of purpose flipped on its side must be devastating. There is little explanation for our involvement in Iraq at this point. The fighting is not being done to protect Americans but to keep a region stable that we made unstable. It’s really a tragedy that some many troops are dying for this.
By addressing Stop Loss, writer/director Kimberly Peirce [Boys Don’t Cry] who has a brother serving in Iraq, draws attention to a little known war time occurrence. As there is no draft in the United States (as long as John McCain does not win the election), by executive order, soldiers can be Stop Loss. This means that they can be sent back for additional tours of duty. More than they had originally planned on. In Stop Loss, Peirce tends toward being too ambitious in showing every possible angle imaginable (including an upbeat blind amputee at a Veteran’s hospital—one of the squad Brandon led). This diffuses the issues and concerns instead of making them powerful moments in the film.
Unfortunately the film attempts to tackles too many war-related themes and it causes confusion and disparity and makes the film wander. Trip to the military hospital and then the scene where someone who has been dishonorably discharged and commits suicide gets a full military funeral. I don’t think so. The bold imagery provides an emotional connection but it just does not fit. I know why, as a filmmaker, Peirce chose certain scenes. She wanted to tell the story of the war from all possible angles and in doing so needed these powerful images of coffins and pomp and military bravado. Surely Peirce means well and I wanted to cry and really love this film.
Stop Loss delves into the psyches of those involved in war and also provides mediation on the war’s effects both physically and mentally on those directly and indirectly involved. Unfortunately the film lacks levity and depth to make it truly memorable and relevant. I wanted to be able to tell everyone to run out and see it in the theater but I can’t. It’s well worth putting in your Netflix queue and that’s unfortunate because Peirce is a heartfelt talented filmmaker and there certainly are stories to tell about Iraq that focus on humanity.
STEELE RECOMMENDS: NETFLIX IT!
film review: Baby Mama
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on May 12, 2008

Not sure why I would think that a film called Baby Mama would be thoughtfully entertaining. I don’t know. I guess I was under the impression that Tina Fey is smart and witty (maybe she’s just best working her own material in television time) and BC graduate Amy Poehler can add a savvy spin to material. Baby Mama is written and directed by a dude, another SNL alum, Michael McCullers. The film has a few chuckles but quickly steers itself straight into the safe funny zone. The stereotypically safe funny zone.
You know women single and over 35 must be super successful “career women” and have given up on any sort of social life. All women want children. The whole infertility thing is just hysterical and so is pregnancy and giving birth, while we think of it. The jokes are so tired. And you’ve seen them before. I’m not a major fan of 30 Rock but I’ve enjoyed some of the episodes and thought Tina Fey might be a little different. She does make the successful single woman stylish at times on that show. Though even there you see the jokes from Alec Baldwin about her being a lesbian because she’s wearing pants or how she’s pathetic because she’s over 30 and single. Oh, it’s OVER honey.
I like to think that I’ve been picky. I have a brain. I have a heart. I use both in making my decisions. I have never had any male friends say that they don’t expect to meet anyone or that they’ve “given up on dating.” No, it’s only my girlfriends who have careers. Not everyone needs to be part of a couple or to have a family to be considered successful. Oh, I’m joking. Of course you have to check all those things off your list or you’re a real loser. Who doesn’t know that? I spend enough time in therapy. And I’m being so sarcastic, in case you didn’t figure it out. Yet sadly our American society does think that these are the things a woman must do– the career, marriage and family or there’s just something off, something wrong.
Kate Holbrook (Fey) wakes up one day and starts seeing babies everywhere and guess what? She realizes she wants one. And now. She is 37! So screw the whole finding a partner thing, she’s doing it solo. Unfortunately her doctor doesn’t “like” her uterus. Kate is an executive at a Whole Foods-style organic market in Philly. But she’s moving up the fast track to Vice-President of Development and been assigned the task to oversee the building of a flagship store. Kate decides to pay an exorbitant amount of money to a blue collar surrogate (Poehler) with a deadbeat boyfriend (Dax Shephard). Laughs ensue when Angie has problems with her boyfriend and moves in with Kate. Oh, an odd couple for the ages. This might have been amusing 20 years ago. It is just that dated and tired. The girl from the wrong side of the tracks finds herself in the enviable position of being able to sample the life she could have had. And the upwardly mobile single girl learns to loosen up her uptight ways and let her hair down. To Poehler’s credit she does not make Angie a complete caricature but fleshes her out to have a brain in the bleached blonde head.
Along the way, Kate meets Rob (Greg Kinnear), a local juice store owner/ex-lawyer. Cue in the obvious jokes about organic food, vegetarianism. It just is too good to have any flavor. Rob and Kate go on a first date to a raw food restaurant and the food is completely out there and unappealing which is so unrealistic. They end up getting cheese steaks at a street stand because being vegetarian just is not cool. Slapstick doesn’t suit him. Kinnear is the smart girl’s funny guy and slapstick doesn’t suit him. He belongs in a more sophisticated comedy. In an understated, easy going role, Steve Martin plays the new agey boss (he rewards employees with “five minutes of uninterrupted eye contact). Kate also has the black doorman/buddy (sexy Romany Malco from Weeds). She has to get a hip factor from someone.
Baby Mama has sight gag after sight gag—the bullet shaped sperm container, peeing in a toilet, “clubbing” in just plain 80s trashtastic outfits, not to mention all the moments in the birthing class and at the obstetrician’s office. Of course it’s written and directed by a dude.
So for Fey to think that this would be the perfect comedy to do with Poehler, is so unoriginal and so disappointing. Was it the easiest thing to do? To turn a SNL skit into a 90-minute film? To make obvious jokes about getting pregnant, infertility, being single, organic food? It’s 2008 and women apparently still cannot have it all Maybe Chelsea Handler needs to write a film. She’s definitely not apologetic about being single and not wanting children and having sex and having fun. I respect her for that.
In the Apatow-effect of filmmaking, we have the crude-ish jokes, the anti-feminist undertones and what on reflection to me seems like sheer distaste for even being a woman. It’s just not funny. Which means it’s going to do well at the box office. The general movie-going public is not all that bright. There are some ridiculous plot twists and a super tidy ending. I know going to the movies is an escape but the best escapes are also rooted in reality. You know you could maybe be in that moment. It’s a possibility. If you cannot relate to some aspect of a film, then the film has not done its job.
If you’ve seen the trailer, you’ve seen the film. Save your $10.00. I’ve just spent more time writing this review than enjoying Baby Mama.
STEELE RECOMMENDS: SKIP IT!
IFF Boston 2008: My Effortless Brilliance, Crawford
Posted by Amy Steele in Film on May 12, 2008
My Effortless Brilliance
Director Lynn Shelton says that she let her actors riff throughout the majority of this film where a scruffy, self-deprecating novelist (Harvey Danger lead singer Sean Nelson) struggles with a waning friendship– his friend dumps him actually– and his sudden success as a novelist. Nelson pretty much plays himself, but instead of being a singer he’s a novelist. In this ambling feature, he’s a bit insecure but has a good sense of humor. The film lingers in this comfortable persona. Weird hand held shot, camera angles and extreme close-ups secure the neurotic mood. My Effortless Brilliance has some funny, smart moments, such as Eric (Nelson) saying “I had a brie incident,” and cutting to a shot of him biting into a wheel of brie.
STEELE RECOMMENDS: WAIT FOR THE DVD.
Crawford
Did you ever wonder what the town of Crawford and the townsfolk are really like? Me either but this documentary lays it out in front of you. Northerners have stereotypes of Southerners and Southerners have stereotypes of us. This doesn’t do much to dispel any of them. Not that this is the goal although at times I think, wow, the filmmakers must think it’s amazing to find such an open-minded high school teacher in small town Texas. She’s just cool. The thing is, Crawford is only 15 miles from Waco, Tex. It’s not completely isolated in the middle of the Lone Star state. With a population of 700, Crawford got overwhelmed when then-governor/ now-President George W. Bush bought a ranch or built a ranch (I think that’s what he did but the film doesn’t provide those details). Coy political move or real desire to hunker down in a small town? Where did he live before he became governor? He did work in oil and own a baseball team. The filmmakers focus on a handful of colorful locals: a conservative horse wrangler, an avid Bush supporter, an idyllic, creative young man, a pastor, a socially aware school teacher and a Vietnam vet. A blue state view of a red state is the end product. When it’s about these people it’s interesting, when if veers away to provide political context it loses focus. Though how can there be film about President Bush without mention of this messy war?
STEELE RECOMMENDS: WAIT FOR THE DVD











You must be logged in to post a comment.