Posts Tagged AMY STEELE interview

sTEELE INTERVIEWS: singer-songwriter Lenka

Australian-born Lenka sings sweet and upbeat pop songs. She’s based in Los Angeles and her second solo album Two is currently available. Lenka tours this month.

I recently asked the singer-songwriter a few questions.

Amy Steele: How did you become a host of a television program in Australia?

Lenka: I had been an actor in Sydney for quite a few years but was studying at art college and starting to explore music. They asked me to audition and i thought it would be a fun, easy “bread-and-butter” job, which it was! We did comic skits in between the cartoons…

Amy Steele: Why did you leave acting to become a singer?

Lenka: I wanted to do something more creatively fulfilling, where i had more control over the content. And of course, i adore music and fell in love with the feeling of singing.

Amy Steele: What is different and similar about acting and performing as a singer?

Lenka: I feel like they’re fairly similar; both are performing, both are a heightened reality. But the big difference is, the character I’m now playing is myself!

Amy Steele: Who are you listening to?

Lenka: I’m loving Lykke Li’s new album and old $2 records we buy on the street.

Amy Steele: What kind of vocal training did you have if any?

Lenka: I took three lessons with an amazing vocal coach in LA to learn how to warm up and preserve my voice. I don’t like the sound of a trained voice though, so that’s all I’ve done.

Amy Steele: Did you get discovered in Australia or had you already moved to Los Angeles?

Lenka: I came to Los Angeles to tour with a band i was in, Decoder Ring, and then started doing solo music over here. So it’s really all happened in America for me.

Amy Steele: Who are your greatest musical influences?

Lenka: Old Jazz singers, Bjork, Fiona Apple, Goldfrapp.

Amy Steele: How do you like making videos? With your acting background how does that affect putting together a video?

Lenka: I love it! Gives me a chance to indulge in performing for cameras again. I’m glad to have had all that experience, I think it makes it a lot easier for me now…

Amy Steele: What do you like best about singing?

Lenka: The sensation of the release of emotion through melody and vibration.

Amy Steele: Do you find any challenges as a woman in the business?

Lenka: No not really, I’ve felt great respect and camaraderie as a woman.

Amy Steele: The music industry has changed quite a bit. How does that change the way that you write, record and perform?

Lenka: It’s become very internet-community based. Very immediate. That’s both good and bad I feel. Some of the mystique and anticipation has gone with this whole YouTube world, but then again, the way fans can be involved is absolutely amazing.

LENKA TOUR DATES:

6/10 New York, NY Bowery Ballroom

6/11 Philadelphia, PA North Star

6/12 Washington, DC DC9

6/14 Columbus, OH Basement

6/16 Pontiac, MI Crofoot Ballroom

6/17 Chicago, IL Subterranean

6/19 Minneapolis, MN 7th Street

6/29 BostonCafé 939

purchase album at Amazon: Two

, ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: singer/drummer Amanda Spring of Point Juncture, WA

The Pacific Northwest has a thriving music scene these days with talented bands such as The Decemberists and Death Cab for Cutie, among others. Only recently, I’ve discovered the brilliant Point Juncture, WA. Intriguing arrangements, varied instrumentation, thoughtful lyrics, yearning and honeyed vocals, feverish melodies all combine to make Handsome Orders an album to play again and again.

Amanda Spring [vocals, drums], Victor Nash [keyboards, vocals], Skyler Norwood [drums, bass] and Wilson Vediner [guitar] comprise the Portland, Ore. band Point Juncture, WA. Amanda and Victor bought a house and built a recording studio in it so that the band can record and engineer their music. Handsome Orders is the band’s fourth release.

I recently spoke with Amanda Spring.

Amy Steele: How did you all meet and decide that being a band would work?

Amanda Spring: Victor and Wilson and I went to high school together in southern Oregon. Portland was the obvious destination for many of our musician friends and other creative types who wanted to remain Oregonians but also have a vibrant scene. Once in Portland, I met Skyler in a recording class and he made me laugh so we became fast friends. Then he recorded our first EP “Juxtapony” at his studio and we included his name among the members on the CD in jest. And what is written becomes true. We have had other members through the years but we are a four piece now.

Amy Steele: Not many women are drummers. What has been your experience as a female drummer?

Amanda Spring: I’ve had a great experience as both a female and a drummer. I think the “girls can’t rock” sentiment is confined to battle of the bands scenes in 80’s movies. Of course Portland is the “Girl’s Rock!” capitol. We even have camps for that sort of thing here. If there is criticism about my drumming behind my back then the joke’s on the hater because I can’t hear it! It’s not uncommon for at least one of the other bands on a bill we play to have a female drummer.

Amy Steele: how did you get into music yourself and learn to play drums and sing?

Amanda Spring: My parents were hippies and we always had a drum set on the school bus parked on the farm, so I dabbled over the years. Even now I wouldn’t say drummer if asked what I play because I have so many musical interests: Songwriting, singing, ukulele, bass, recording.

Amy Steele: what makes you work well together?

Amanda Spring: Point Juncture, WA works well together because we are all friends and we put in years of writing and recording and touring with each other and we’ve learned to let go: of expectations, of musical ideas not gelling, of grudges. People writing songs together (who are often from different backgrounds, music theory-wise) have to learn to communicate respectfully. For example, instead of saying “That part is so 90’s rock cliché” you might say “I could hear some more dissonance over that”. Moreover, if a song is not bringing us joy we just drop it and move on.

Amy Steele: The music industry has changed drastically, what have been your greatest challenges?

Amanda Spring: I am a successful musician because I am fulfilled artistically. I have a studio to record in 24-7. I get to play super fun shows with bands of my choosing and we produce albums that I think are good. It helps that I have side projects too. ioa is a 7 piece band that I lead on ukulele. Also, I play bass in a band called The Four Edge and I make hip-hop beats. I don’t know when it happened but I stopped caring about fame. If the shows are packed at a 300 capacity room I’m not pining over a 700. I’m through with that early 20’s itchy feeling of “when are we gonna get big”. Turning 30 in a few days. (Coincidence?)

Amy Steele: Being in Boston, I have to ask, what’s the story behind the song “Boston Gold?”

Amanda Spring: Unfortunately the title has no connection to the fair city. The lyrics “embossed in gold” just got misheard as “Boston Gold,” which sounds cooler!

Amy Steele: you grow your own food and camp on tour. How does this factor into touring?

Amanda Spring: Camping on tour is awesome if you build the extra time in for it. If there’s only time to sleep, a new friend’s couch is preferable. Camping or stopping to do a hike breaks up the monotony of driving and is a great time to either bond with your band mates OR get some space from them if they’re buggin. Also, beautiful landscapes + free time = song inspiration.

Amy Steele: What would you like to see changed for tours or at venues to make things more eco-friendly/ vegetarian/vegan-friendly?

Amanda Spring: If there was one change I could implore all venues to make in terms of vegan items it would be the milk. Lots of places already carry soy milk but there are such better alternatives. Rice! Almond! Just sayin’.

Amy Steele: Victor told me that you do all a lot the vegan cooking on the road. What are your fave things to cook or go-to recipes?

Amanda Spring: If a tour takes us through the Midwest I bring a grill and a cooler with some homemade sauces. Fall tours have a bonus of being harvest time, so I just pick everything from the garden which besides being delicious makes good gifts for the people we stay with. When we do go out to eat we usually opt for a grocery store, which is cheap and has something for everyone. Sitting in a van for hours a day is not great on the stomach, so eating fast food would just be adding insult to injury. It gets easier to be on tour as a vegan. Partly you learn what to have stocked up in the cooler and partly you learn to lose the feeling of entitlement that you should get a well-rounded vegan meal at every restaurant. After all, entitlement is what makes the SAD (standard American diet) prevail. It does heighten my emotions when I see the lack of options that pervade most of the country. It’s probably good to leave the vegan bubble of Portland to see what it’s like for most of the population. If my example (or BBQ tempeh) inspires anyone, then it’s good for the cause.

My favorite things to grill are veggies with teriyaki BBQ sauce: broccoli, zucchini, yellow squash, onion, mushroom. These are good choices because they don’t need steaming first. Tempeh is good too and couscous is easy on the road because it doesn’t take much cooking. I usually bring a big container of marinated tempeh from home in the cooler. Anything that you can make camping you can make in a parking lot. If you’ve got time to stop at a friend’s and use their kitchen before load-in the possibilities are endless. We also make a lot of hummus and veggie “vanwiches” and salads. Just stop to picnic at a rest stop that has running water to wash the dishes.

Amy Steele: What cities have the best vegan options?

Amanda Spring: The best cities for vegan food are what you’d expect: large metropolitan areas. Portland, Seattle, New York, Chicago, Denver, etc. The exciting thing is I’ve noticed vegan options sprouting up everywhere over the years. I think some of that is because people are really starting to look into allergies (thanks dairy-allergic people!) and because of college campuses. Students are the fastest growing sector of vegans. Let’s hope they stick to it after graduation.

Point Juncture, WA website

purchase album: Handsome Orders

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: author Jennifer Haigh

Faith engulfs the reader in its examination of religion and familial bonds. The fourth novel from Boston-based writer Jennifer Haigh delves into the personal fallout when a priest gets accused of a horrific act against a child. Questions arise, lines get drawn.

Jennifer Haigh kindly took the time to answer my questions.

Amy Steele: What interested you in writing about Boston’s Catholic Church scandal?

Jennifer Haigh: When I moved to Boston from Iowa in 2002, the city was reeling from revelations that Catholic priests had molested children, and that the Archdiocese had covered up the abuse. I was raised in a Catholic family, spent twelve years in parochial schools and had extremely fond memories of my interactions with Catholic clergy. It’s no exaggeration to say that nuns and priests were the heroes of my childhood. Like many people, I was horrified by what had happened in Boston – and, as later became clear, in Catholic dioceses across the country. Faith was my attempt to explain the inexplicable, to understand what I couldn’t make sense of in any other way.

Amy Steele: You have great details about seminary life. How did you research the book?

Jennifer Haigh: Priests were a fixture of my childhood, and yet when I began writing Faith, I realized that I understood very little about what their daily lives were like. I read a terrific memoir, The Other Side of the Altar, written by a former priest named Paul Dinter. Later I contacted the writer and told him about the novel I was writing. He very generously agreed to answer my questions about life in the priesthood. Paul taught me a lot about the education and training seminarians receive as well as the day-to-day duties of an ordained priest.

Amy Steele: Why did you decide to narrate the story in the way you did—sort of first person/ kind of third person piecing everything together?

Jennifer Haigh: It was an accident, really. I’d never written a novel in the first person. It seemed unnecessarily limiting, since it’s rare for a single character to know all the interesting parts of any story. But as I read about priests accused of abusing children, I was struck by the difficulty of proving or disproving such charges. There are never any witnesses; the only people who know the truth of the story are the priest and the child, and often neither will talk about it. The rest of us can only speculate about what went on behind closed doors, and that’s exactly what the narrator does in Faith. The novel is Sheila’s attempt to arrive at the truth, not merely the facts of the case but the reasons behind them. In that sense, it mirrors the way we all try to parse these stories: with very little evidence one way or the other, it’s hard to know what to believe.

Amy Steele: I think a lot of people forget that priests have family. Why were you attracted to this aspect of a clergy’s life?

Jennifer Haigh: Priests have an unusual relationship to family: they live very isolated lives, and choose not to marry or have families of their own. And yet they are always somebody’s son, somebody’s brother. That interests me.

Amy Steele: All your novels have been about complex family dynamics. In Faith you focus on the three siblings. How did you decide on characters and how they’d interact?

Jennifer Haigh: There’s no good answer to this question. It’s a series of very small decisions made over several years. I’m a slow writer and discover the characters incrementally, one small bit at a time.

Amy Steele: When you come up with an idea, do characters come to you first or the story?

Jennifer Haigh: Characters always come first. Before I write a single chapter, I spend about six months ruminating about who these people are, where they came from, how they feel about each other. By the time I sit down to write, they are as real to me as anyone in my own life, and I have a real sense of how they’d react in any given situation.

Amy Steele: What is most important to you when writing a novel?

Jennifer Haigh: To use the language well, and to tell the truth as I see it. Though the characters and situations are invented, I think novels can be truer than journalism, tell larger truths about what it means to be human. At least, that’s the hope.

Amy Steele: What is your favorite thing about your novel Faith?

Jennifer Haigh: I am exceedingly fond of all these characters, and of the landscape of the South Shore.

Amy Steele: Having written three well-received books, did you feel pressure in writing this one?

Jennifer Haigh: No more or less than usual. As always, the first year was extraordinarily difficult. It’s hard to make something out of nothing, and I always wonder periodically if I’m fooling myself. In that respect, the fourth book isn’t any harder than the first one, or any easier.

Amy Steele: How has your writing process changed over the years?

Jennifer Haigh: It’s changed very little. I still work slowly and consistently, and am quite secretive about what I’m writing. I spend the first year or so drafting the story and a couple more years revising. The only significant difference is that I now work outside my home, at a little writing studio with no telephone, no internet access and absolutely no distractions. I can’t work in cafes or parks or on airplanes, because there’s simply too much too look at. I need the imaginary world in my head to be more vivid that the one in front of me.


trailer for Faith

Jennifer Haigh website

Shop Indie Bookstores

purchase at Amazon: Faith: A Novel

, , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: author Molly Jong-Fast

Molly Jong-Fast pierces reality by projecting her own obsessions throughout the pages of The Social Climber’s Handbook, a sharp look into the lives of Upper East Side denizens. She’s dichotomously self-defeating and confident. She’s smart and hysterical. I feel like she’s the sister I never had [or even wanted]. Molly is charming, caring and real. She loves Edith Wharton [me too!], fears flying [insert joke about her mother Erica Jong’s groundbreaking feminist tome Fear of Flying], has an MFA from Bennington, adores a good mystery and when she’s not taking care of her 3-year-old twins or their older brother, is reading a classic novel. Molly’s currently working her way through The Sacred Fount by Henry James.

Molly and I had a two-part conversation by phone on Friday.

photo by Ben Ritter

Amy Steele: How did you come up with the idea to write The Social Climber’s Handbook?

Molly Jong-Fast: I wanted to do something like The Talented Mr. Ripley. That’s what I sat down to do. That’s a book about an outsider. He’s an outsider trying to make it. Daisy’s an outsider too but it’s not the same kind of alienation. There were two things I wanted to happen. I read an interview with Bret Easton Ellis. I think he’s a really great writer. I love that book Glamorama. He was saying, “There’s no such thing as a female serial killer.” And that’s not really true. There was Eileen Wuornos… that prostitute serial killer and there are a lot of women who kill all the time, especially lately. So that kind of annoyed me. And the other thing is that I walk around not that well dressed and, relatively speaking to my peer group, I look homeless. I really stand out. People say, “You’re so down to earth.” I say, “I’m not down to earth. I’m just a mess.” But even I could probably get away with a really serious crime because people just don’t look at white people as critically. They just don’t.

I read a lot of books. Much of what I read is classics. But I was going through a spate of reading mysteries. Readers are willing to suspend their beliefs when they really like something. In some ways what makes me a bad writer is that I’m really stuck on whether something can happen. I get nihilistic—“Nobody reads. Nobody’s going to buy it.”

I’m a huge Edith Wharton fan. Huge. The truth is that people like to read about that world and it’s interesting. It’s interesting to all of us and it’s interesting to me.

Amy Steele: You said Daisy was kind of powerless.

Molly Jong-Fast: I have this interest in people being powerless and how you get to a position where you are so powerless and then how one could conceivably get out of it. How do you get out of something like that when you’re stuck?

Amy Steele: I see that in The Social Climber’s Handbook but then also that her husband thinks she’s powerless but doesn’t know everything about her.

Molly Jong-Fast: My obsession has always been the secret life of the American housewife. Having grown up with parents who were divorcing and divorced, I didn’t know that marriage is its own thing. It’s not necessarily a good thing– marriage as an institution. Our parents didn’t really explain to us that it’s actually quite a lot of work. It requires an enormous amount of sacrifice of things you might normally not want to sacrifice. I was surprised when I got married. And a lot of women really make the ultimate sacrifice by just totally sacrificing themselves to the institution. Some of that is sacrificing the larger part of who you are. I was always feeling bad about myself. And what happened when I had kids, which was really great, was that I didn’t have much time to feel bad because I had the physical labor of childcare.

Amy Steele: I was the same way. My parents divorced when I was young and my mother re-married when I was about 12. I see commercials and things with women saying, “This is the day I’ve dreamed about.” And I never dreamed about a wedding or getting or being married. Who dreams about a wedding? Particularly thinking about the Royal Wedding today.

Molly Jong-Fast: It’s the whole institution that we don’t get great information on. We don’t have a great sense of what it really is. The compromises and sacrifices that one makes when one gets married aren’t that different from what every American woman makes when she gets married.

I never particularly thought I’d get married. I just sort of wandered into the situation that I’m in. I’m lucky because I really like my husband a lot. I never thought, “I’m going to get married and I’m going to have five kids.”

Amy Steele: I guess I’m just not the marrying type as Dorothy Parker or Mae West would say.

Molly Jong-Fast: The world has changed so much. In some ways, the worst of the feminist movement was saying that you could have it all because you can’t have it all. I’m so ineffective it’s a joke. I write one book every seven years. I don’t have it all. If I had to support my family we’d be on the street. I have a little bit. You have to make compromises all the time. I think that’s just a function of life too.

Amy Steele: What makes the Upper East Side stand out from all the other neighborhoods of Manhattan?

Molly Jong-Fast: When I lived up here as a kid it was not very fancy. It was basically like Brooklyn Heights. I grew up in a townhouse. It was constantly getting broken into. It wasn’t a particularly glamorous place to live. My parents had a terrible divorce and everything like that but I didn’t think we were rich. I thought we were lower-middle-class and then I went to college and I met people who had grown up on food stamps. They really had hardship. No one in my family had any idea about money because we were all artists. If anyone made any money, it would quickly be frittered away. It was an extremely terrifying childhood because I always felt like there was no stability.

Now my husband works in finance and we’re fine. It’s also that I can’t think about it too much. I’m not much but I’m all I think about. [Molly jokes]
What is good about the financial crisis was that people stopped looking at bankers as super heroes. That was really a bad thing.

I did what I set out to do. I wrote a satirical novel. If you pick this book up on a beach, you’re going to really enjoy it and it’s not going to make you any stupider. There’s a lot of interesting writing in there and there are a lot of big words. And I think when you take a topic, like rich people on the Upper East Side, back to Edith Wharton, it’s an interesting world and it’s not being written about terribly well. Certainly there are subject matters that will get you more sympathy from your reading public. I think it’s still a very valid and interesting thing.

Amy Steele: What makes you want to write mysteries?

Molly Jong-Fast: I really like mysteries. A lot. Very smart people read mysteries. I’d really like to do a big generational novel that you’d need to have a spread sheet to keep track of everything that’s happening. I love those kinds of books but I’m not sure I’m there yet as a writer. I’m not sure with all these children [three] I’m organized enough. You really have to keep track of everything. But I can’t imagine I’m going to get smarter as I get older so maybe I should.

Amy Steele: Why did you decide to become a writer?

Molly Jong-Fast: I sort of happened into it and I think that’s why children of writers do become writers. You sort of think that this is what people do. Who doesn’t write books? I got into it and I couldn’t get out of it. I love the writing. I like getting into something and going back and forth with it and making it work. I find myself really interested in it. I love the process of it.

Amy Steele: What do you like about the process?

Molly Jong-Fast: I like coming up with something. The problem I always have is that I can’t think of a plot. So it takes me three years to think of a plot and then I’ll write out-takes of other plots and then I’ll have to throw them out. A lot of times I’ll write something and think, “This is really brilliant.” Then I’ll give it to my husband [Yale PhD] and then I’ll read it again and say, “This is the worst thing I’ve ever written,” and I’ll throw it out.

I don’t have a great sense of perspective of my work. The one thing about writing a novel is that you just need to do it and you can’t worry about whether it will sell or whether people will like it. You just have to do it. It’s really hard. It’s a hard question. Do you matter? Does anyone matter in such a fast-paced world?

Amy Steele: What kind of education did you have that has shaped you as a writer?

Molly Jong-Fast: Basically my education has been my PhD husband telling me to read this, read that. He edits my work. He’s a very big part to why I’ve gotten to be a better writer. I don’t think by any stretch of the imagination I’m where I’d like to be when I die which is hopefully not tomorrow. I’m also dyslexic and that has given me a lot of trouble. Being dyslexic made me a much more compelling human being. I feel like I grew up in relatively privileged circumstances but I definitely felt in my mind I wasn’t doing well in school. I couldn’t get a handle on it.

Read my review of The Social Climber’s Handbook.

The Social Climber’s Handbook: A Novel

, , , , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: singer/songwriter Amy Speace

Singer/songwriter Amy Speace released her third album, Land Like a Bird, in March. In 2009, she released The Killer in Me and in 2006, Songs for Bright Street. Speace brings passion and depth to her folksy songs. There’s the haunting “Drive All Night”, the inquisitive “Change for Me” and lovely “Vertigo.” She recently moved from New Jersey to Nashville.

She graciously took the time to answer my questions.

Amy Steele: You were a stage actor for the National Shakespeare Company. What did you bring from that experience to your songwriting?

Amy Speace: Definitely a really clear sense of story and focus of the story. I think I draw from my life as a playwright in the writing, when I make choices about the song/story, and I draw from my work as a theater director similarly, like what is the focus of the moment I’m writing about. And then, all those years as an actor, living inside another character, especially HUGE characters like the ones Shakespeare wrote, who live in BIG passion, BIG decisions, life and death and war and love and grief, I don’t necessarily utilize the tools I have as an actor when I’m onstage singing, because I’m not playing the part of anyone but myself, but when I’m writing, I’m able to easily creep inside a character, imagine the ‘what if’ of their life, their moment, their choice, what the air feels like, etc. It’s not something I do consciously at all. When I write, I’m just writing, sometimes losing myself in the phrase or the feeling of the song, but I know that I have those tools inside me from all the years in theater, so I’m sure they inform my choices as a writer.

Amy Steele: When did you decide to focus on singing and songwriting instead of acting?

Amy Speace: At the risk of being insensitive, I know that 9/11 changed my direction in life. I watched the World Trade Center fall with a songwriter friend from the Hoboken side of the Hudson River and honestly, although we were across the river and safe, none of us knew it at the time. I’d seen the 2nd plane hit the tower from a park overlooking the river while walking my dogs, ran inside to my apartment, got my friend, a battery powered radio and a camera and we ran to the river and with a small crowd watched in awe and shock and terror as the buildings collapsed and I can honestly say, we all thought that the end of it all was about to come, that more planes would be coming and we just stood there watching, because we were stuck. I think the experience of that and the rest of that day, waiting to find news of friends, watching the zombie-like survivors who’d been ferried to Hoboken from lower Manhattan, dusted with ash, wet from being hosed off from the National Guard in white Tyvek suits, all the bars along Washington Street in Hoboken were full of silent survivors, waiting for rides to get back to their homes… it was such a quietly terrible day and it was one of those moments where it becomes crystal clear how short life is. And I booked my first tour soon thereafter, turned down a theater job. I didn’t realize I was making a long-term choice, but somewhere in me I was. It was where my heart wanted to go. It became urgent for me to pursue the craft where I was expressing my experience directly, through my own words and my own voice, without the filter of the fourth wall. I wasn’t good then. But I was willing to put the time in to figure it out and knew I couldn’t focus on that while also pursuing life as an actor.

Amy Steele: You must be very comfortable onstage due to your training as an actor. How does that translate in a live show?

Amy Speace: I’m just used to it and I went to school to develop a craft to being comfortable and finding (or creating) home onstage, to having a direct conversation with the audience. It’s not unlike a soliloquy where you have to directly address the audience and step out of the realm of the Play. In the end, a set of music has an arc like a Play, you have a rhythm to the show, and you can control the timing by how you put the songs together, where you talk and tell stories, etc. Well, somewhat…or make an attempt to control and then know when to let go… There’s crafting it and then there’s the beautiful letting go of the improv moment where what you planned doesn’t go right and you have to figure it out on the fly.

Amy Steele: What do you like best about being a performing artist?

Amy Speace: The conversation between me and the audience and that it’s a different thing each night, no matter if I’m playing the same exact songs. I never get bored.

Amy Steele: How did you end up moving from New York to Nashville?

Amy Speace: I started working with a Nashville-based management company, started coming here more often, and the close-knit community of musicians really appealed to me. I was ready for a change. I’d been in NYC area for 18 years. Disbanded my band, so I was working more solo and looking to collaborate with different musicians and looking for a bit of a change musically, and my personal life had changed. I’d gotten a divorce. I kindly and gently burnt the house down and was ready to rebuild it on different turf.

Amy Steele: What has changed since that move?

Amy Speace: Well, everything. Career wise: different manager; different label; different producer; different band; different side-guys. I live in a house with a front porch and a swing and a large backyard, not a tiny, claustrophobic studio. I don’t hear taxi horns and garbage trucks and the yelling of neighbors in different languages. I hear birds and lawn mowers. Nashville is a more affordable place to live for a singer-songwriter. I have loads of new friends and I still see my old ones, because most of them are touring and everyone comes through here. I feel a bit like I shed a lot of old skin by coming south, and at my age, I feel like I’m just discovering myself again.

Amy Steele: What’s the difference between the NYC music scene and the Nashville scene?

Amy Speace: Both scenes are little scenes within a greater context. You can’t really talk about the scene as a singular entity in either place. But both seem to have these little ‘scenes’ that form around a club. In NYC I was a part of the Living Room scene, I guess. Kind of the singer-songwriter world, but I was also really in touch with the alt-country/Americana gang that played at Banjo Jim’s or The Lakeside Lounge. In NYC, you’ve got the Williamsburg indie-rockers, the Brooklyn folkies, the Hoboken rock scene, the lower east side clubs, the jazz, the classical, and there’s a whole lot of cross-pollination. Side players play with a ton of different people and bands and come from a variety of backgrounds. Songwriters tend to not collaborate as much – that’s the big difference. In Nashville, as far as I’ve seen (and I spend a fair amount of time on the road so I wouldn’t say I’m in the Nashville ‘scene’ at all, I dip in and out), there’s the country world, the songwriters who have staff deals and write for the commercial market and come out and play The Bluebird, and there’s the 20 something scene of indie-popsters who are all extraordinary and play places like The Basement. And the Americana gang, who live in on the road, Jim Lauderdale, Mary Gauthier, Abby Washburn. I’m kind of hovering… I don’t play that much in Nashville, a few gigs here and there at The Basement or The Bluebird, but I’m finding that the collaborative nature of this town is a bit more open than NYC. I loved NYC. But it’s a harsh town and it will separate the weak from the strong fairly quickly. I’m glad I moved here to Nashville with a career already in place, because I’ll bet this town can also be daunting when you’re just starting out. I came here with a support system in place, so that was really helpful.

Amy Steele: Many of your songs are about place and relation. What inspired you on this album?

Amy Speace: Love. Falling in. Falling out. Figuring it out. Letting it go. Desperation and passion and urgency and complete confusion.

Amy Steele: Where is your favorite place to write a song?

Amy Speace: Currently in my music room in my house – where I have my piano and keyboard and guitars and a small love seat couch that’s super comfy to curl up on with a book. It’s the room Neilson and I wrote many of the songs for this record.

Amy Steele: Can you tell me about the recording process? What was it like to work with Neilson Hubbard? What approach did he bring to the production/ what did he add that other producers may have not?

Amy Speace: Neilson was really interested in getting the honesty, the real truth out, whether that means in the songwriting, the vocals, the arrangements… He’s all about integrity. He’d say, “yeah, but does it COST?” and that was our touchstone. Making it cost something. You know? He’d push me in my writing. He’d hear a song that I was working on and he’d say, ‘make it cost something to you” and then the bridge would do that in 2 words and the song would come together. He was amazing and he pushed me to a deeper place. But a place that was also more pared down and simple. And the recording process was a breeze, to be honest. We’d write the song, call the guys and get into the studio a few days later and just build the arrangement around me just singing and playing what I’d written. It wasn’t much more complicated than that. We didn’t say ‘Oh this song NEEDS strings or it NEEDS horn’, Neilson has Kris Donegan on guitar and Evan Hutchings on drums and Dan Mitchell on keys and horns and we just brought those guys in and let them do their magic and voila. And as for the difference between this and my other records, I think vocally, I got to a place I hadn’t before. We really worked on what key worked for the song. Not what key made me sing the song the BEST, but what key brought out the truth in my voice. And for the most part, I didn’t stand up in an iso booth with headphones and sing the song over and over. I recorded it at a desk as if I was just whispering the song to a lover or a friend. That was really inspiring…

Amy Steele: What do you feel are the greatest challenges as a female singer-songwriter?

Amy Speace: Whether to wear jeans or a gold lame dress and if you should shave your eyebrows and wear a mask.

That’s flippant. But I’d say that the challenges are the same for men as for women. Except that at this stage in my life, I think what is striking is if you aren’t hugely famous with enough money to tour by bus with a nanny, there’s definitely a tough choice to make in terms of whether or not you want to have children. I remember reading an interview with Jonatha Brooke about this about 10 years ago and I don’t think I was ready to even hear what she was saying, but now I am. But as the industry breaks apart and so many artists are going out independently without the tour support of a major label, but going back to touring 180 dates a year out of their van, smaller clubs, support for larger acts, we’re all eking out a living on the road, and, as a woman, if you’re at the point where you want to have a baby, that’s taking time out of this whole ride and quite possibly takes you out of it completely. I do know some that have done it successfully (Deb Talan of the Weepies, Catie Curtis) but they had to (and wanted to) pare down their touring to just weekend jaunts. And I know some great singer-songwriters that once they became mothers they quit. Happily. It’s kind of this hush hush thing that’s not talked about in those industry seminars at SXSW and CMJ and I think it’s a really valid conversation to have. What are you willing to personally sacrifice, because the pursuit of this thing is really all encompassing? For me, it’s worth it, or at least I hope it is, and I love my life but I also know that it’s been really hard to have a relationship, and I don’t have children. Yet. And I’m not sure that’s something that my male cohorts think about as much as my female singer-songwriter friends do. I could be wrong. And this could smack of anti-feminism from a very definitely third wave feminist.

Amy Steele: How have the changes in the music industry influenced you?

Amy Speace: I came into this as the whole industry was fracturing, and I was working a day job at EMI Music Publishing while starting out playing the NYC clubs, so I saw it all go to pieces. So I never expected to be a ‘major label’ artist and since I knew that going in, I tempered my expectations and that led me to a kind of freedom. Nobody was going to sign me so I signed myself and took my time figuring it out on my own from how to tour to how to write a song to how to put a record out on my own. And once I was able to partner with an indie label, I

Amy Steele: How do define a good song?

Amy Speace: One that moves me somehow emotionally

Amy Steele: How did you become involved with the Big Star documentary Nothing Can Hurt Me?

Amy Speace: Jody Stephens and I met a few years back during the North American Folk Alliance Festival/Convention in Memphis when I was doing a concert at Ardent Studios. I was a Big Star fan and he heard me and we just hit it off. He’s a really amazing human being, just the nicest man and so interested in all kinds of music. Big Star was to do a concert last year during the 2010 SXSW Conference in Austin at Antone’s, but Alex Chilton died on Wednesday night of that week and the concert became a tribute and I was invited to participate and had the privilege of performing with The Posies and Evan Dando and being a part of that emotional show. I was also invited to be a part of a similar tribute at the Levitt Bandshell in Overton Park in Memphis later that year.

Amy Speace Website

Label: Thirty Tigers
Release date: March 29, 2011
PR: Conqueroo

purchase at Amazon: Land Like a Bird

, , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: singer/songwriter Thomas Dolby

This summer, Thomas Dolby [perhaps best-known for 80s hit “She Blinded Me with Science”] will release his first full-length album, A Map of the Floating City, in 20 years. In the garden of his East Anglia beach house, Dolby writes and records aboard a solar and wind-powered 1930s lifeboat. The three-track EP called Oceanea came out on March 28.

Dolby broke onto the music scene in 1982 with his synthpop style with The Golden Age of Wireless. After releasing several more albums, Dolby quit music in the early 90s. He moved to Silicon Valley and founded the tech company Beatnik Inc. He co-invented the polyphonic ringtone synthesizer which Nokia embeds in its mobile phones. In 2001 he became Musical Director of the TED Conference, an annual event in Long Beach, California.

Fans can access Dolby’s music early through a social network-based game, The Floating City, to be launched this spring via Facebook, Twitter, and The Flat Earth Society.

I recently had the opportunity to interview Thomas Dolby.

Amy Steele: Why have you decided to release an album after a twenty-year hiatus?

Thomas Dolby:I like the way the music business is heading. Technology has finally stripped away the bogus marketeering, and it’s becoming a meritocracy. And the Industry is no longer there to force musicians into an unnatural cycle of singles, albums and tours. We can make music at our own pace and release it directly to the audience, without first having to win favour with roomful of executives in satin tour jackets.

Amy Steele: What effect has being the musical director of TED had on you?

Thomas Dolby:It’s made me realize what an appetite there is in the world for entertainment that is also thought-provoking, eclectic, against the grain. And I’ve met some fantastic musicians that also really care about the state of the planet: people like Tracy Chapman, Natalie MacMaster, Paul Simon, Jason Mraz, and Jake Shimabukuro.

Amy Steele: You write and record on a solar and wind-powered 1930s lifeboat. How did you choose that?

Thomas Dolby:I live on the beach in East Anglia [Eastern coast of England] and my garden floods from time to time. It was not an option to build the proverbial garden shed studio. So I looked for something that would float. Now when the waters come I will rise up like Noah. (Well actually that’s not quite the case as I punched a 5-foot doorway in the hull.)

Amy Steele: Your current EP, Oceanea, is relatively simple in style and mellow. How has your songwriting process changed over the years?

Thomas Dolby:Mellow, yes. Simple, no… though I take it as a compliment that you thought so. ‘Simone’ has the most complicated chord sequence I have ever written. It covered 5 sides of large scale manuscript paper. I guess since I have returned to music I am focused on the essence of the song, not the frills. I have no desire to wow the audience with my production technique. There’s plenty of that out there. But there’s a dearth of real songwriting talent, lyrics and structure and storytelling, and that’s something I actually do rather well.

Amy Steele: How are the songs on Oceanea different than what someone might expect from you?

Thomas Dolby: Well, when I look back at the first chapter of my career I certainly touched the largest number of people with my quirky synthpop persona as in ‘She Blinded Me With Science’ and ‘Hyperactive’. But I touched people the most deeply with my more intimate, atmospheric stuff, like ‘Screen Kiss’ and ‘I Love You Goodbye.’ Those are the songs that people kept listening to over the years I was away. They endured. Whereas the more poppy stuff has been supplanted and overwritten a thousand times. Now I have little patience. And I have no record company to demand I keep feeding them pop fluff. So I’m not going to waste any time, I’m just getting to the heart of the matter.

Amy Steele: Can you explain to me your system where fans can access your new material through a social-networking game?

Thomas Dolby: Yes. It will launch in a few weeks, and run for three month up to the release of my album A Map Of The Floating City in the summer. You can access the game for free through your web browser. It’s set in a kind of 1930s that might have come to be had the strange experimental weapons of that time come to fruition. There were sonic cannons and Tesla death rays. In the game, tribes of players collaborate to explore what’s left of the planet following an event of mass destruction. Survivors take to the oceans in the hulls of abandoned vessels, and eventually they raft up, like the merchants’ barges in Tokyo harbor in the 17th century. A strange kind of barter culture emerges, a form of ‘maker’ society where players cobble together inventions using relics from the past. Most of this is done in text form, you understand, it’s a kind of collaborative fiction, not a 3d shoot em up. And as you explore the game, you will discover new songs from the 3rd and final EP from my album, ‘Urbanoia’.

Amy Steele: I think social networking is extremely important for today’s music artists. If you agree, why do you think it is or what role does social networking play for the musicians?

Thomas Dolby: It gets you close to the fans and involves them in the creative process. Gives them a stake in what you’re doing. Take Imogen Heap. She involved her fans right from the period where she was writing songs for ‘Ellipse.’ She would put up Version A and Version B of a bassline and get their input. When she was ready to think about the album cover she asked for artists to submit ideas. She could call for a flashmob and with 3 hours notice, fill a Borders or a Starbucks for an impromptu listening party. And in between she tweeted about what she crumbled on her salad at lunchtime. The Record Industry hates that, because they want everything to be geared to a single, rigid release date. But we don’t make music that way, never did!

Amy Steele: When you left the music business and worked in Silicon Valley, what were the greatest challenges to you and what was the best aspect of it?

Thomas Dolby: It seemed like a very grown-up industry. Creative flair is highly prized. Then when it’s hard to turn into a product, people tackle problems, get round a whiteboard, come up with a solution, implement it, test it. And the money people fund all of this, so we got to play all day like kids in a futuristic playground. I liked that approach! The challenge was for me that, as an entrepreneur, the clock is always ticking. The longer it takes you to hit ‘pay dirt’ the more diluted you become, and you end up owning only a small fraction of your own company. You lose not just equity, but also control, as the VCs and engineers and accountants start to smell money. In a way I’m totally ill-suited to being a businessman, because right at the point where the money starts to flow, I lose interest.

Amy Steele: How did you come up with the idea for the polyphonic ringtone synthesizer?

Thomas Dolby: Oh, that was anything but an act of inventive genius. And it was not my idea. Not solely, at least. My company Beatnik had some brilliant engineers and we had made a very small, efficient software synth. Nokia, the biggest cell phone maker in the world, was starting to see Japanese cell phones with a polyphonic MIDI chip. Nokia didn’t want to pay the money per unit for a dedicated chip, so they looked for a small synth. Bingo. They asked us to send engineers to Finland and come up with a format for doing ringtones. They encouraged us to publish it as an industry standard, so that their competitors would be forced to fall into line. And it worked like a charm. They shipped billions of phones with Beatnik embedded. The rest of the industry came to us to license the engine. But it was short-lived, because as MP3 and WAV ringtones became possible, there was no longer a need for a synth. So now it’s doomed to be a question on a Trivial Pursuits card: Thomas Dolby invented A. Liquid paper? B. Ringtones? C. The Internet?

Amy Steele: What do you envision to be the greatest change in the music industry in the next five years?

Thomas Dolby: More and more sophisticated tools for doing targeted marketing of music to fans. Highly targeted advertising, detecting trends early on and focusing marketing dollars where there is already a germ of interest. These will slash the cost of releasing music. However, they will be beyond the grasp of the musicians, so a new kind of management/label/promotions company will emerge, and bands will choose one to help release their songs. However instead of relinquishing rights, bands will retain the rights and the power, and just give up single-figure percentages to those that can work the tools.

Amy Steele: What can listeners expect from your full-length release, A Map of the Floating City, coming out this summer?

Thomas Dolby: It will be my best album! A wide spectrum of music idioms, and some great storytelling, I hope. It will probably upset a few people who have preconceptions about their, or my musical tastes. But I’ve never been scared to upset a few people! The apple cart needs tipping over from time to time.

Thomas Dolby website

Thomas Dolby’s twitter

, , , , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: author Jenny Shank

She looked out the window at the little spruce that Salvador had planted on Ray’s first birthday. Patricia asked him not to. She was born with a foreboding of disaster, and so she avoided moments that seemed too idyllic, so as not to create memories that would come back to wound her later.
Because of her gloomy nature, her cousins from Pueblo had nicknamed Patricia La Llorona, after the weeping woman of Mexican folklore, and the nickname proved prophetic.

The Ringer, by Jenny Shank. Publisher: The Permanent Press (March 1, 2011). Literary fiction. Hardcover, 304 pages.

The Ringer creatively explores race relations in Denver through little league. A police officer shoots and kills a Mexican immigrant during a suspected drug raid. Tragically the commanding officer sent the unit to an incorrect address. Outrage and tensions surge in Denver’s immigrant and Latino community. The families of the officer who fired the lethal shot and the deceased man become the central focus. Author Jenny Shank effectively weaves together the stories of these two diverse families with one commonality: baseball. The two extremely likable yet fractured protagonists, Ed and Patricia, illuminate this story with verity making The Ringer memorable and engaging.

Jenny Shank worked on writing The Ringer for eight years. She’s the Books & Writers Editor of NewWest.Net. Her stories, essays and reviews have been published in McSweeney’s Internet Tendency, Prairie Schooner, Bust, Rocky Mountain News and The Onion. The Ringer was a semi-finalist for the James Jones First Novel Fellowship and the Amazon.com Breakthrough Novel Award.

Jenny Shank

We spoke by phone last week.

Amy Steele: Where did you get the idea for The Ringer?

Jenny Shank: In 1999, in Denver, there was an incident where cops shot a Mexican immigrant on a no-knock raid and it turned out they had the wrong address on the warrant, just like in my book. It became a really big incident in Denver because it was very shocking. There was also a lot of racial tension which I hadn’t seen before.

The thing that really interested me is that the cop who killed the man was not the same man who made the mistake on the warrant. So someone else made the mistake on the warrant and this other cop was carrying it out. He was just doing his job and I just imagined that his guilt must be really terrible and that kind of stuck with me.

I had an idea to do a book about baseball before that happened but it needed some kind of plot. I wanted to do little league baseball because that’s something I know a lot about watching my brother and my cousins played the intense little league that leads to going to play college ball and minor and major league ball. So when this incident happened I read all the newspaper articles and came up with a plot that combined those two things.

Amy Steele: I was wondering how you made the little league connection.

Jenny Shank: The shooting is such a sad story. I guess my short stories are funnier and this is more of a serious thing than my short stories are and so I wanted the baseball element to have something that added a lighter and more hopeful element to the story. When two things don’t necessarily go together, I figure out how they can be connected and that’s how I get my plot ideas.

My cousin is a left-handed pitcher like Ray in the book. He plays baseball for the Red Sox AAA team in Pawtucket. He just re-signed with the Red Sox and he’s been in the minor leagues for a long time. My brother is also really good. He was recruited by major league teams and colleges while in high school but had to get surgery on his knees. So that didn’t end up happening but I grew up going to their baseball games.

Amy Steele: How did you transition from writing short stories to a novel?

Jenny Shank: The Ringer is my third novel I’d say. I wrote one and a half novels before that. I had been writing short stories all along. The first novel I wrote, I had done half of it and it wasn’t going anywhere so I gave it up. My next goal was to finish one so I wrote it all the way through and I guess that took three or four years and I was tired of it at this point. I just didn’t feel like revising it to make it really good. So this third one I said I’d write it all the way through and then revise it. So it was a three-step process where I gradually learned to write it.

This novel I figured out that chapters are structured much differently than short stories. I don’t think there are any chapters in this novel that would stand alone as a story and I think that’s good. That helps the momentum in a novel. It was a 13-year training process.

Amy Steele: How does working as a reviewer affect your writing?

Jenny Shank: Well, first of all, that was my job. It’s good to have a job that’s fun to do. I think that’s how I learned really how to write. One of my favorite writing guides is Francine Prose’s Reading like a Writer. Basically she says that the best way to figure out how to do something you’re having trouble with is to go to someone who’s done it before and read their book. I think I owe what I was able to do to reading lots and lots of books.

I edited the Onion A.V. for eight years and simultaneously reviewed books for the Rocky Mountain News for ten years until it went under and then I started reviewing books for New West. I review at least a book a week and I think it helps you be an attentive reader when you know that you’re going to have to write about it. That’s really why I got into book reviewing.

In college I liked how you talked about a book and thought a lot about a book after you read it. I liked book reports and I liked writing about books in a conversational tone more than we did in school. It’s something I enjoy and I’ve learned a lot from it. I haven’t done as many writing classes as some people have because of having to work and take care of my kids but learning from books really helps me. I feel like it’s important to keep doing reviews. Book reviews are disappearing and people need help getting the word out about their books.

Amy Steele: What is the greatest challenge of writing a longer form story?

Jenny Shank: I have some ideas of characters and have an idea of the general thing I need to have happen in the chapter but coming up with a compelling action to portray that is always the trick. My early drafts were just describing what was happening and it wasn’t actually happening. Readers really like it and get involved when you create the scene for them. So I think the biggest challenge for me is always creating the scene.

Amy Steele: What interested you about writing about police officers?

Jenny Shank: I was actually hesitant because I’d never written about police officers before and it’s done so much—TV, movies and everything. The one thing I had going for me is that I don’t watch much TV so I’m not aware of it. I’ve never seen Law & Order so I don’t know what’s done on [those shows]. The one show I love, that I did watch, is The Wire. It’s one of my favorite works of art in any medium. I didn’t have a lot of the current clichés in my head. I have to spend so much time reading. I was hoping to avoid cliché and reading books helped me with that. [Shank used books such as Deadly Force Encounters: What Cops Need to Know to Mentally and Physically Prepare for and Survive a Gunfight by Dr. Alexis Artwohl and Loren W. Christensen and I Love a Cop: What Police Families Need to Know by Ellen Kirschman for reference.].

I also started talking to people. My cousin’s husband is a cop in Omaha. The reason why cops are written about so much, I think, is that they’re in a job where things happen, there’s action. That’s useful for anything. I discovered that in smaller cities there aren’t full-time SWAT units and I liked that idea because I wanted Ed to be involved in this incident that I read about but I also wanted him to be out in the city interacting with people. I liked that combination.

It was a lot of research but I was confident because I knew the baseball part, I knew the Denver part. I knew the other part I could explore and do research about it. That makes it fun. Write what you know half of the way and research something else to make it interesting.

Amy Steele: Having a non-fiction background, why did you decide to write fiction instead of non-fiction?

Jenny Shank: I don’t think my life is interesting enough to write a memoir. There are aspects of it that I could write stories about. As far as a researched book, I just had always written fiction. I always read it. I enjoy it. It’s what I want to do. I enjoy it the most and I don’t have personal material. If people have really big problems then that makes a good story.

Amy Steele: Why did you decide to write the story from the point of view of two characters?

Jenny Shank: The idea that there are two sides to the story is what the story is to me. The cop made a terrible mistake and then this horrible thing happened to this family who lost their dad. My characters are all completely different from the original people. I just took the action that happened and then purposely didn’t learn anything about the real people who were involved in the incident.

I went to the Denver public schools and I went to schools where white people were in the minority pretty much. Depending on the school, there would only be 20-30% white people. I went to some schools that were majority black and some that were majority Latino. From that experience I learned about everything having two sides. I was immersed in those different worlds and cultures that were different from my family and it just made sense to tell the story that way.

I enjoyed having two voices. That helped to make the plot as the plot gradually comes together as they become aware of each other’s existence. That was a drive for the plot. I liked switching back and forth. Working so much on the drafts, I had problems with both at different times and I think that they are equally imagined now in the book.

Amy Steele: Why is there a large Hispanic population in Denver?

Jenny Shank: Colorado was originally part of Mexico territory. Colorado was one-third Mexico, one-third Texas territory and one-third Louisiana Purchase. There are people that live in Colorado, especially southern Colorado, whose families have been here for hundreds of years. It’s deeply embedded in our state’s history and right now the population of Denver and the population of our state is at least 30% Latino. That consists of some people whose families have been here a long time and lots of immigrants. It is a big Latino city.

Jenny Shank website

purchase from Amazon: The Ringer

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: singer/guitarist Stephen Ramsay

Dreamy/ shoegazing indie pop band Young Galaxy are Montreal-based Stephen Ramsay [vocals/guitar] and Catherine McCandless [vocals/keyboards] and Stephen Kamp [bass/vocals]. Stephen and Catherine formed the band as a duo in 2005. Young Galaxy released its third album, Shapeshifting, this month on Paper Bag Records. I interviewed Stephen Ramsey.

Entertainment Realm: Young Galaxy started as a duo with you and Catherine. What changed when you went from duo to trio?

Stephen Ramsey: It was the most convoluted move to gain one extra member ever I think! We were two, then six, then five, then four, then three. I guess I forgot that three comes right after two somehow. It would have saved us a lot of trouble! Actually, Stephen Kamp – our third member – was the first to join the band after Catherine and me. So in a way, it’s been the three of us for as long as the band has been around. And just recently, we’ve become a five piece again. Go figure…

Entertainment Realm: How has the band changed since you first formed?

Stephen Ramsey: How much time have you got for this answer? It’s changed immensely. As I have mentioned, we’ve seen many members come and go but I’m proud to say that we have remained focused on becoming a better band since day one. Along the way, we’ve learned how to be better in business, how to perform, etc. We’ve toiled away in the trenches while everyone else has been distracted by shitty music. Haha. Honestly, we’ve felt almost like we we’ve been training, getting ready for a title fight. We are very ambitious, and have very high standards creatively. I firmly believe most bands don’t hit their creative peak on their first one, two, even three records. Too bad the industry doesn’t invest in bands long term anymore – I think it means bands with promise are thrust into the limelight before they fully develop, and are used up very quickly before they can truly make their best music. Everyone’s looking for the new, big thing. For us, it’s always been a matter of sticking around, waiting until the timing is right, doing this long enough until we got really, really good at what we did. We want to be masters of our craft. I want to be a black belt in rock n’ roll, just like David Lee Roth!

Entertainment Realm: What is the Vancouver music scene like? What influence did that have on you as a band?

Stephen Ramsey: I have no idea really! Not because I wasn’t around it, I mean, I used to dj there for many years – but really, I dabbled with bands more than anything. I mostly did bedroom recordings. I haven’t lived there since 2005, and I think it’s become more vibrant now than it was. Back in the day, it was every band for itself. There was no galvanizing scene or momentum.

Entertainment Realm: What makes Young Galaxy work well together?

Stephen Ramsey: At the heart of the project are my girlfriend Catherine and I. We’re a couple and we’re best friends. We’re very close, there’s a kind of unspoken understanding about what we’re trying to accomplish musically that doesn’t need to be explicated much. It’s a very intuitive relationship. We make each other creatively braver than we would be on our own. Beyond that, we’ve built the band around the premise that people who are involved in it should be treated as friends and with respect. It’s not like we have many perks or much money to offer, so you might as well have a good time if you’re going to sacrifice your time and energy in the project, right?

Entertainment Realm: How do define a good song?

Stephen Ramsey: Whatever gets a best new music rating on Pitchfork.

Entertainment Realm: What’s your favorite song on Shapeshifting and why?

Stephen Ramsey: Honestly, I don’t have one. As Keith Richards once said, ‘don’t make me cut my babies in half’. Haha. I love Keith Richards.

Entertainment Realm: Can you describe your creative process?

Stephen Ramsey:

1 part sunset from the top of the ruins in Sintra, Portugal
1 part Manhattan cocktail at the Angel’s Share, NYC
1 part baby panda
1 part cherry blossoms falling off the tree and then filmed backwards so they appear to be going up (in slow motion)
I part watching the morning fog burn off while sitting on the dock at Sproat, Lake, Vancouver Island
The juice of one lemon

Shake well, pour over ice and serve.

Entertainment Realm: How did you get to work with Dan Lissvik [producer] of the band Studio in Gothenburg, Sweden? How did that affect the recording?

Stephen Ramsey: I stalked him! I contacted his band, Studio, on Myspace back when it was a useful tool still. After a few email exchanges over a year or two, he agreed to work on an album with us. It did affect the writing and recording, because we left a lot more space than we were used to. We knew he’d go in and do his own thing over top, so we were careful not to fill every inch of sonic space in the songs. We’d never done that before, so that was a very new process for us. It meant using a lot of restraint, which I am now a big proponent of in recording. It’s good to rein it in, to only commit the best ideas to tape, rather than every idea that comes to your head. Dan certainly influenced us this way – he preached this before we sent him anything we’d done. We tried to stick with it and be very economical in our choices, musically.

Entertainment Realm: What can an audience expect from a Young Galaxy live show?

Stephen Ramsey: I’m not sure yet! We’re rehearsing a new band now, one that I’m very excited about. It’s our best band yet in my opinion. I think if we apply ourselves, the sky’s the limit… we’ll be better than U2 in no time! Haha. Other than that, a lot of fake blood, baby pandas, cherry blossoms filmed falling upwards in slow motion, you know – the usual.

Entertainment Realm: What are you listening to now?

Stephen Ramsey:
Broadcast – Tender Buttons (R.I.P Trish Keenan)
The Streets – Computer and Blues
Cold Cave – The Great Pan Is Dead
Grimes – unreleased new material
Goblin – Suspiria Soundtrack
Fabio Frizzi – Zombi Soundtrack
Future Islands – In Evening Air

Entertainment Realm: What inspires you?

Stephen Ramsey: Impending doom.

Entertainment Realm: Why the name Young Galaxy?

Stephen Ramsey: It was my hotmail account name back in 1999 or something. I turned to a random page in an astronomy book and they were the first words I came across. I think I had a list of about a thousand names and that’s what I settled on. So it’s all pretty mundane actually!

Young Galaxy website

Young Galaxy Tour Dates
3.17 Boston – TT The Bears
3.19 Brooklyn – Knitting Factory
3.21 Philadelphia – Ku Fung Necktie
3.22 Washington DC – Red Palace
3.23 Pittsburgh – Brillobox
3.25 Chicago – Empty Bottle

, , , , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: chefs Benjamin Knack and Jason Santos [Hell’s Kitchen]

On Friday, I spoke with the two Hell’s Kitchen contestants from Boston– Executive Chef Jason Santos [Gargoyles on the Square] and Executive Chef Benjamin Knack [Sel de la Terre]. Both guys shared candid, refreshing thoughts on Hell’s Kitchen [and more]. And bonus for a reporter: both guys are verbose. Ben gets a few more bonus points because he described many vegetarian dishes for me that made my mouth water. I learned so much about the restaurant business, kitchens, staffing, cooking styles, flavors and of course being on Hell’s Kitchen.

Amy Steele [AS]: Why did you decide to take part in Hell’s Kitchen?

Chef Jason Santos

Jason Santos [JS]: I don’t really have a phenomenal answer except that I’ve always worked in small restaurants that don’t really have a lot of money for PR. So I figured if I could get on the show, I could get to that national level that I feel like I should be at. I also did it because I’ve admired Gordon Ramsay for a really long time. I was really psyched to work next to him. I got to cook with him every day.

Chef Benjamin Knack

Benjamin Knack [BK]: It started about five or six years ago. I’ve always been a big fan of Gordon Ramsay. I wanted to get the chance with Gordon. I worked in really physical kitchens with a bunch of French chefs and Italian chefs, who were very very physical — scream, yell, throw stuff, grab you, kind of push you around the kitchen. So when I heard about Hell’s Kitchen, I said “I can handle that as long as I don’t get kicked out of the kitchen.” I love Gordon Ramsay and I wanted the challenge of him trying to throw me out of the kitchen.

AS: What did you know about Gordon Ramsay before and what did you learn from him on the show?

JS: I have ten of his books. I feel that we have very similar personalities. The one thing I love about Chef Gordon Ramsay is that he is the most charismatic and witty person I have ever met. And I sort of pride myself on my wit. His standards are unbelievable. He’s got 14 Michelin stars. Just to be at that level. How do you even get to that level? I’ve always admired that about him. I love his personality on television. I know he can be abrasive but I love it.

BK: Gordon worked in restaurants that I wish I could’ve worked at, that are in books that I’ve read. When Gordon came out with his own restaurants it was about flavors, amazing sauces, amazing purees, perfect vegetables and things cooked perfectly. I’m a very technical chef. I don’t do things that are floating on your plate. I don’t have an apple that tastes like a chicken. I do basic French techniques and I think Gordon does a great job. He’s always been an idol of mine.

AS: What did you expect when you arrived on the show/ during the competition?

JS: Andy Husbands from Tremont 647 was on the show last year and I worked for him for seven years. We tried out together and we made the show different seasons. I told him I didn’t make the show because I didn’t want him to come back and tell me this is how it’s done. I wanted to go in with zero expectations. I didn’t want to know anything. If I prepare, I normally don’t do as well. It’s a TV show first and foremost. It’s about the editing. I never even cooked to make the show. There are eight million people watching each episode. You can only get edited to a certain point. It is what it is. I saw it as sort of a game.

BK: I want to be in the moment. So I decided not to watch the show, not to study for it, not to have a strategy going into it– go there, live the moment, experience it. If you live life like that, for the most part you usually win. You get the most out of it if you are living life and not going through the motions. My expectations of Hell’s Kitchen: I thought it would be like a regular kitchen, prep and cook and work all night and Gordon’s going to yell and scream at you. But it’s ‘tomorrow’s a challenge:’ get ready for egg cooking. I was in for a rude surprise for what it was like. I thought it would be more like cooking school or cooking camp. So my expectations were thrown out the window after the first few days. You are always in a loop. You never know what’s going on.

AS: How is it working with people from all different backgrounds? Or are you used to it having worked in the business so long?

JS: A little bit of both. You have some people who are really good cooks and some people who are really bad cooks and when you put in all these alphas and when they’re all competing for $250K, interesting things happen. When I hire people, I usually get to choose the level of culinary knowledge. So if I have room for someone more entry level and I can train them, that’s great. Or if I only want to hire someone with a lot of experience I can do that as well. Whereas in Hell’s Kitchen, you have some people who have never cooked on a line before. But that makes for good TV. If you bring together a bunch of people from different ethnic backgrounds, life experience backgrounds, culinary backgrounds and throw them together and say, “Go!,” it makes for great TV.

BK: Top top-end restaurants, they call it competitive kitchens. We want to be better than the kitchen next to us. Legal Seafoods just wants to make money. We want to cook for 300 people like we’re cooking for 120 people [the quality]. We have people in culinary school, people who’ve never cooked before and are in bands, people who work at Sel [de la Terre] during the day and Sonsie at night. We have people at all different levels and experience so it’s very realistic for me. I’m very used to it. We might be the same age but where I am in my life is my life. Where you are in your life is your life. My job as a chef is to make you as successful as possible and share all my knowledge. I like diversity. I grew up in Queens. And that’s all experience, monetary backgrounds and race. Everyone has their different tricks and you can really absorb that and grow together.

AS: What did you learn on the show?

JS: I learned a lot. The cool thing about Hell’s Kitchen is when you’re in the kitchen, you’re IN the kitchen. It was like a job. You’d wake up in the morning, go prep all day and do dinner service at night. My cooking style is not known for being simple. Hell’s Kitchen has really simple food: really fresh ingredients, just a few items per plate. That’s what I tell people: you have the Gordon side, which is extremely real and then you have the TV side. You cooked it good, you cooked it good. If he calls you out, he was right. I thought that was really cool. And just to cook next to him and watch him. He’s definitely a teacher. He’d show you how to do it his way.

BK: Gordon shares techniques: timing, communications, cooking. He’d pull me aside and say, “That looks great. But here’s a way to do it better.” That’s much better than him just saying something looks great. Gordon’s one of the best chefs in the world. When he works with you on something, that’s amazing. He’s sharing his knowledge. During the show he’s 100% genuine. He may scream and yell when something’s wrong and he’s really pissed. When he says something’s good, he really means it. When he shares something with you, he’s really open, really caring. He’s very passionate about the ingredients. You don’t see us break down the kitchen. You don’t see us prep. I prep really hard. I work very hard to get my station set up. A lot of places that aren’t like the kitchen ARE like the kitchen. When you lose a challenge, you do things that people do every day. Cleaning up the water—you can be there and bitch and moan or you can go with the attitude that you don’t do this every day and actually appreciate losing a challenge.

AS: What was the greatest challenge?

JS: Being away from everything. Full blown sequestering: no email, no phone, no magazines, no radio, no pens and papers. Nothing. We did a photo shoot the first day we were there and while we were waiting, I was flipping through a magazine and as a joke I ripped out a picture of Paris Hilton, smuggled it back to the dorm and put it on my nightstand. I woke up the next morning and it was gone. You go together and you leave together. So to be away for two months is challenging.

BK: Being without my family. I never spend a day away from my wife or my daughter. A lot of chefs work and then go away. Since my daughter was born, I’ve spent every day with her. It’s all about the family. We cook dinner together. Ella breads the fish, she mixes salads and she makes eggs for us. [note: Ella is two and favors using the blue heat-resistant spoon to do her cooking.] We do all the things that most people don’t appreciate. We do things together as a family and we appreciate everything we do. When I was away, I missed all those things. I’m not talking to my wife. I’m not seeing my daughter. The biggest challenge was getting over not being able to see them.

AS: Best part of HK?

JS: To win a reward. And you only see five minutes on television. The little breaks kept me sane. The first episode we did a helicopter ride. I’ve always wanted to go up in a helicopter and I got to do that—flying over L.A. sitting next to Gordon Ramsay was amazing.

BK:
Working together with everybody. Being part of the production and not just being part of the show—interacting with the sous chefs, interacting with Gordon, interacting with production. Experiencing everything, not just the TV part. The whole is more important than the means. It was definitely life changing. Gordon puts his heart and effort into it.

AS: When I was talking to people via Twitter during the last episode, we wondered why more people didn’t know how to make risotto when it’s on the menu every year.

JS: There’s 563 ½ ways to make risotto. So you can practice all day long. I’ve been making risotto for 15 years and I’ve never made it the way Gordon makes it. Some people like risotto really thick. Some people like it really thin. You certainly can’t practice something you haven’t been shown how to do. We were given a recipe book and we had to remember 12 items for the menu—not only what they were but each individual ingredient to make each item. Basically it was, “Here’s a book and a photo, go make it.”

BK: It’s more complex than it looks on TV. Making risotto for Gordon Ramsay, a Michelin-rated chef is slightly different quality. Every chef has a different technique so it is different. When you work in someone else’s kitchen and they say the wall’s blue and it’s red, the wall is blue. It’s however that chef wants it. You learn that chef’s palate and technique as you work in that kitchen.

AS: How different is it to work when every move is scrutinized, names are called, and people are undermined?

JS: I can’t believe I’ve made it this far and haven’t gotten yelled at yet. [Hell’s Kitchen] is brigade style and very few kitchens still use that. Brigade style is that if you’re doing vegetables, you’re just doing vegetables. That’s all you cook all night long. So now you have to time the fish guy who serving it, with the meat guy . . . So whatever you’re doing that’s all you need to worry about.

AS: What was your signature dish?

JS: Grilled Hangar Steak, corn & queso fresco salad, black truffle demi-glace, nasturtiums [funky flower, very peppery, similar to arugula]

[note: nasturtiums were Isabella Stewart Gardner’s favorite flowers that she hung annually in the museum courtyard]

BK: Butter poached lobster with lobster agnolloti, English peas and truffle foam.

AS: How will you apply your Hell’s Kitchen exp to your career?

JS: It’s like anything. If I read a cookbook, I apply it to my cooking. Whatever we served in Hell’s Kitchen, I took some of the things I loved and put my own tweak on them.

BK: I keep things simpler. Gordon’s about simple, quality techniques. On set they call me Gordon Jr. because I always say hello to everyone and talk to everyone. Just continuing to push for perfection. And when times are tough, pushing my staff and pushing myself.

AS: Do you think you have to be omnivorous to be a good chef?

JS: Yeah, I don’t know. I’m sort of tough on vegetarians. I always have at least one plate that’s vegetarian that’s really creative. We put a lot of effort into it. Some restaurants just serve vegetables on a plate. The more restrictions you have, the less a chef can shine.

BK: No I don’t think so. For a good chef, you have to cook to your strengths. You have to find the right venue. I’m only a chef if I’m in the position as a chef. Otherwise I’m a cook. Before service, I walk the line and taste everything.

Hell’s Kitchen airs at 8pm Tuesdays on FOX.

Both chefs have Hell’s Kitchen viewing events at their respective restaurants every Tuesday to discuss the show and answer questions.
See websites for additional information.

Info on the chefs:

Chef Jason Santos
Executive Chef at Gargoyles on the Square in Somerville, Mass.
Facebook
Jason’s twitter

Chef Benjamin Knack
Executive Chef at Sel de la Terre, Longwharf, in Boston, Mass.
Facebook
Sel de la Terre twitter
Ben’s twitter

, , , ,

Leave a comment

STEELE INTERVIEWS: author Anastasia Hobbet

Anastasia Hobbet kindly answered some questions.

Amy Steele [AS]: Where did the idea for this story come from?

Anastasia Hobbet [AH]: The novel was born as a short story with Theo and Hanaan as the main characters. In bringing their cross-cultural romance to a crisis when her father objects, I was able to weave in a lot of threads about Kuwait, and I saw that I could write a bigger story—wanted to write a bigger story. The experience of living in the Middle East had been a very rewarding one for me, and in the aftermath of 9/11, when so much of what we heard about Arabs and Muslims in the US was dark and suspicious, I wanted to highlight the deeper, richer dimensions of the place.

AS: What kind of research did you do into the treatment of the servants in Kuwait?

AH: You can’t avoid observing servants at work in Kuwait. Foreign workers are everywhere: in homes, shops, offices, industry, education, and public works. Kuwaitis are far outnumbered by their foreign workers. The country’s population is about 3 million, and nearly 2 million of those are foreign workers: 65% of the population and 90% of the work force. That work force includes 280,000 domestic servants. That’s about one for every 5 Kuwaitis.

 In private homes, where I had my closest contact with domestic servants, including my own home, I interacted almost daily with maids, gardeners, workmen, and their employers. I came to know many of them well—including their families in some cases; and because I had friends and acquaintances on both sides of the divide—Kuwaitis who employed servants as well as foreign workers employed by Kuwaitis—I got a good feel for their attitudes about each other, their backgrounds, and their life stories. Many international human rights organizations address the issue of maid abuse as part of their overall coverage of women’s rights, human trafficking and modern-day slavery. I also follow and admire writers like Nicholas Kristof of the NY Times, who writes frequently and passionately about these issues.

AS: How do you feel that the people of Kuwait really feel toward Americans? Helped them in Gulf War but for “own purposes” and Saleh sends his children to American school because learning English puts them at “great advantage.”

AH: Kuwaitis still have a fairly positive view of Americans, unlike much of the Middle East, where we’re not popular. To throw in a few stats: In 2007, the Pew Global Attitudes Survey found that 62% of Kuwaitis had a positive opinion of Americans in 2007. Compare this with 30% for Egypt, 20% for Jordan, 15% for Morocco, and even lower for the Palestinian territories. Even so, there’s a lot of ambivalence about the US, its international policies and goals. Kuwaitis were under no illusion that the US joined the first Gulf War in 1990 out of sheer altruism, and they fully expected the American government to exact some payment from Kuwait for the help in rescuing their nation from Saddam Hussein. This came, in their view, in the form of expectations–of special treatment for American military requests and business interests. The Kuwaitis weren’t cynical about this, just realistic: it’s the way the world works—and they’ve benefited since the 1950’s from a close association with the US, when oil was first discovered there by Gulf Oil, a US company. Wealthy Kuwaitis, like Saleh in the novel, want their kids to speak English—and French and German for that matter—because they understand the benefit of being world players. They want their children to feel at home on a wider stage than the Middle East alone can offer. 

 

AS: Having lived in Kuwait for five years, what is your favorite thing about it and what did you like least about it?

AH: The best: Like Theo, the young American doctor, I relished the opportunity to live in a culture so unlike my own. It was a writer’s dream, to be plopped down in an exotic place, not as a tourist but as a resident of the country for a good long while. What hit me first was how many prejudices and stereotypes I’d brought along with me. Over the years, I felt a growing familiarity with Kuwait, began to understand its rhythms and its ways, and came to regard it as my home. The Kuwaitis made this possible. They’re exceptionally warm-hearted hosts. When you cross a Kuwaiti threshold, you’re no longer a stranger. You’re an honored friend.

The worst: The Kuwaitis in the 1990s, in the wake of the first Gulf war, were busy duplicating the very things I liked least about American culture—the gloss and glitter, the noisy consumerism, rather than pushing their government toward more democracy, offering suffrage to women, and crafting broader rights and protection for immigrant workers. In the novel, Kit’s husband builds fancy shopping malls. Many of my friends in Kuwait loved to go to these places, but I avoided them whenever I could. It seemed tragic to me that the wonderful, traditional Middle Eastern souks, one of the great treasures of the culture, were being replaced by American-style malls. The one thing I would have liked to buy at a mall—a glass of wine over lunch—wasn’t available because Kuwait is officially dry. This seemed a punitive combination to me.

AS: I really liked that you added that Mufeeda would not leave her daughters alone so early in life especially when “there was so much uneasiness in the world, especially for girls.” Can you expand on this for girls and women in the Middle East particularly Kuwait and more “forward-thinking” countries?

AH:  The feminist movement has never caught fire in Kuwait. My sense is that many women fear the changes that it might bring, and think of it as a Western obsession not compatible with their culture and religion. A very few of the wealthier, better-educated Kuwaiti women are the standard-bearers for feminism in Kuwait, but it seems they talk mostly to themselves. A recent survey of Kuwaiti attitudes revealed that most educated white-collar Kuwaitis know next to nothing about the country’s feminist movement—and this is a small place, 3 million people total, including foreign workers. Nevertheless, things are changing for women, an osmotic process that can’t be stopped—you can’t seal out the world, especially when you invite it in via the internet, television, and US-style consumerism—and it’s this lack of control that undermines the confidence of women like Mufeeda. She becomes rebellious herself—distrustful of the old ways, critical of her husband and her own passivity. Her mother’s life seems quaint to her even at this short remove, a couple of decades, and she knows that if Saleh has his way, all her daughters will be educated in the West, which can only accelerate the change between generations. She fears that she’ll lose all her daughters to a way of life she doesn’t understand and doesn’t admire. 

AS: Why was it so unusual that Theo would come to Kuwait to work as a Doctor?

AH: Most physicians in Kuwait are recruited, and some Americans, like Theo, decide to give the place a try. But during the years I lived there, it was so unusual to see a Western doctor that we Westerners felt instantly wary of them. A British doctor worked at one of the private clinics where many Westerners went for primary medical care, and his past was the focus of constant humorous speculation. Was he on the run from a dozen malpractice suits? Was he really a doctor at all, or just a mildly-clever imposter? His name, Dr. Magenta—his pseudonym, we assumed—seemed right out of Agatha Christie or Clue. (Actually, ‘Magenta’ is another pseudonym, which I chose to protect his innocence—in case he had any.)

AS: Why is the class-consciousness so poor in Kuwait? There is also the fact that each nationality bans together so much and that there are clans that stick together. Why is this? Of course, it also happens to a degree in the United States as well but not in such a cruel sense as you often depicted in Small Kingdoms.

AH: Class-consciousness is actually very strong in Kuwait. Why it’s that way is a question only a social anthropologist could answer well, but I’d guess it has partly to do with the tribal history of the Arabs, and the harsh environment of the Arabian peninsula. In the early days, survival in the desert depended upon wit, inventiveness, and frugality. Because the environment offered up so little, every natural resource was precious, and tribal wars were the rule. You had to be wary—even openly distrustful—of your neighbors in order to maintain your own people.  

Another factor: the region has had few permanent immigrants since the Kuwaitis own historical journey as nomads into the area in the 1700’s, so there’s little sense of a melting pot. Guest workers come and go; some stay for long periods of time as non-citizens, such as Hanaan’s family, but they remain outsiders, and usually can’t qualify for citizenship. The British—also a very class-conscious culture—enforced that system in Kuwait. After the First World War and the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Kuwait became an independent sheikhdom under the protection of the British, and a British military colony sprang up here, which paved the way for subsequent trade and commercial development, including the exploration for oil in the 1940’s. There’s still a large British community in Kuwait.

AS: I’ve heard it before but what most Middle Easterners believe about Americans is what they have culled from television and film, truly for most?

AH: Sure, it’s true. It’s true for people all over the world, including some of us Americans. But Arabs generally know a lot more about the United States than Americans do about the Middle East. For generations, Arabs have come to the US as travelers, students, and immigrants. Few Americans have spent significant time in an Arab land. They spend three days seeing the sights in Egypt from air-conditioned busses and come home full of opinions. Our only regular source of information about Arabs and Muslims in this country is a sensationalist news media. This is one reason I felt motivated to write Small Kingdoms. But what we really need in the US is a good, constant supply of Arab novels in translation, both classics and contemporary fiction. Readers in the US need to hear about Arabs and Islam from Arabs themselves.  

AS: Religion is a major part of the book and yet you have also kept it rather low key and not overwhelming. How did you achieve this balance? (For instance, only including the celebratory aspects of Ramadan)

 AH: I’m not a religious person, but I do understand the drive many people feel toward faith. Maybe this is why I can write dispassionately about the topic, until the topic of evolution crops up, anyway. I limited my treatment of Ramadan because deeply devout Kuwaitis were not apt to discuss this solemn month of prayer and fasting with a Western woman in any significant depth, and secular Arabs talked about it in the same way many Americans do Christmas: it’s noisy, commercial, and has lost its true soul. I couldn’t get an in-depth view of Ramadan, so I didn’t try to portray it in intricate detail.

 This may have been a gender issue, though. My husband had a different experience. He was often gently proselytized by Arabs—other men—and was sometimes drawn by them into religious debates. He feels that some of the men he talked to were keenly aware of the common American stereotype—that all Arabs are terrorists at heart—and wanted to prove this wrong, persuade him of their own, and Islam’s peaceful intentions.

AS: Hanaan is looked down upon in Kuwait, despite her intelligence and outspokenness and feminism for being a bidoon. How common is this in Kuwait? How common are women like Hanaan- torn between her own beliefs and those of her family?

AH: The character of Hanaan was inspired by a woman I came to know in Kuwait. She was an uncommon woman by any measure. She felt alone, misunderstood, and mistreated, both by her family and the nation and culture of Kuwait. She certainly had intellectual peers, some of whom I met in the literary circles I visited, but they were Kuwaiti women, not bidoons (officially stateless people, non-citizens, with few rights). They shared no society with this woman, considering her their social inferior. No doubt she exacerbated this separation with her acid pride, but given the low status of bidoons I could hardly blame her. She wanted to belong and she did not.

 I can only speculate about an answer to your second question. As I mentioned earlier, conservative Kuwaitis were unlikely to share their cherished religious views with me. In addition, Kuwaiti family structures are generally very tight. Most Kuwaiti women live within the influence of their families, residing and socializing with the extended clan. Some women I met felt they had almost no time to themselves due to the demands of their very extended families, and true privacy was rare. The woman who inspired Hanaan, felt this lack of privacy painfully but told me that most Arab Muslim women did not and that they avoided solitude.

AS: Who is your favorite character?

AH: Of the minor characters, Dr. Chowdhury is my favorite. He’s inspired by a doctor I knew and admired in Kuwait, and when I started writing Small Kingdoms, he elbowed his way into the hospital scenes and took over the show. Of the main characters, Mufeeda claims my heart. She and I could hardly be more different in background, so she was a real challenge for me to bring to life. I didn’t like her much at first, but I came to like her, to respect and admire her.

AS: I think many Americans think of Kuwait as an oil-rich wealthy country with very tolerant people. In Small Kingdoms you show a much more diverse population and a darker side. How does your book compare to your own experience living there?

AH: Kuwait is a relatively tolerant and forward-looking Arab country, especially compared to its next-door neighbor, Saudi Arabia. My depiction in the novel of Kuwait’s enormous Christian population shows this, I hope. Kuwait has allowed the Christian community to flourish. The vast cathedral in the book is a real one. Take a look at this thing: http://www.catholic-church.org/kuwait/cathedral.htm

The three murders of housemaids are straight out of the newspapers in Kuwait. Some of the characters grew from my own relationships, and I’ve borrowed many stories and histories from friends and acquaintances, making them my own. As for the central action of the book, the imprisonment and abuse of the housemaid Santana: I stood very close to a similar situation and heard of many more, largely from housemaids who took me into their confidence.

The great diversity of the population in Kuwait was a surprise to me in 1995 when I first arrived, and to many incoming Westerners, I think. That was pre-9/11, though. We’ve heard a lot in the US about the Middle East since. Much of what we ‘know’ is still superficial, but we no longer think of all those little countries as indistinguishable, a big block of swarthy people all training to be terrorists. 

AS: The servants being shipped in is very sad and I know it goes on globally. Have there been any regulations?

 AH: Yes, Kuwait does have a few regulations, but they’re not well enforced. Nor are international resolutions and regulations, and chances are they won’t be as long as the source countries such as India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines remain poor and heavily populated. Young people in these countries feel obligated to help their families prosper, much as do poor young men and women from Central America, who will brave any danger to make their way north.

AS: As a former journalist, how did you approach writing a novel?

AH: I wasn’t a good journalist. I was always frustrated by the gap between the facts I could nail down and the deeper, human story I knew was going on in the background. John McPhee can write journalism that nourishes like fiction, but he’s a rare man.

My first novel came about when I wrote a newspaper story in the Rockies about Bald eagles poisoned by ranchers in an attempt to protect their cattle and sheep. An okay piece, but everything I really wanted to know was left unsaid by the facts. I wanted to be inside the heads of the ranchers, to understand what they’d done and why, so I wrote a novel, Pleasure of Believing. Carl, the rancher in the book who poisons the eagles, was just as big a reach for me as was Mufeeda, the devout Muslim wife, in Small Kingdoms. I didn’t understand either one of them when I began writing—didn’t even like them. But I came to cherish them both. For me, this is the great power of reading and writing: I can live behind someone else’s eyes and see their world the way they see it. I can have dozens of personalities—and they deepen my sanity rather than throw it in doubt.

AS: What was your greatest challenge in writing Small Kingdoms?

AH: I had to dwell inside the heads of two Middle Eastern Arab women and an impoverished, uneducated teenage girl from India. The idea intimidated me at first, and I wondered how I could avoid offending a few people, whatever I wrote. However I framed my story, there was always the potential that I’d piss someone off—Muslims, Christians, Kuwaitis, Brits. It’ll happen. If it doesn’t, it’s because no one’s read the book. I’ll probably hear first from an American woman who has lived in the Middle East who thinks I was unfair to American women living in the Middle East.

AS: It’s wonderful how all these different types of people band together, how realistic is that and what makes it viable?

AH: Women are more communal by nature than men, and we all—regardless of nationality—recognize the inherent risks in being a woman: our relative weakness and vulnerability to men, especially when we have little control over our environment. This is the plight of the Indian housemaid Santana Small Kingdoms. She’s poor, far from home, and stranded in the home of an abusive couple. The three people who take the biggest risks to help her are all women. Once they recognize her situation, their sense of common womanhood far outweighs their considerable differences of class, background, and temperament. They toss everything aside except the need to help the girl.

AS: Mufeeda seems set in her ways based on generations of the same practice. Yet she’s caught between present and past. She’s very interesting. How did you create this character? What do you find most compelling about her?

AH: Mufeeda interests me because even as a young woman she straddles the past and the present, the past of her own insular Middle Eastern childhood, which is so close at hand, and the much broader horizons of her young daughters. She’s intelligent and well educated, and yet—in a way—she longs for ignorance when it comes to dealing with the brutal mistreatment of the house maid next door. She doesn’t want to know, doesn’t want to be obligated to intervene. I’m like this myself. I try to protect myself from too much bad news—which is everywhere these days, at every level of focus—or I fall into depression and inaction. Mufeeda comes to a critical moment when she can’t sneak away to hide. When I wrote the first draft of Small Kingdoms, I didn’t know what she’d do at that point. I had to find out.

AS: Middle Eastern servants are “cheap and expendable” yet how can the abuse be justified by the Kuwaitis?

AH: Not all Kuwaitis justify it, of course, and to be fair, a good percentage of Westerners accept it outright when they live in the Middle East. They say things like, “Well, it’s the way things are done here. Who am I to object?” Most Americans turned a blind eye for centuries to slavery in this country, and the goals of the Civil Rights movement have taken decades to sink in. The way a people have ‘always’ done things tends to seem right and proper to them. Even if it’s not right, how do you change it with any dispatch? How do you eradicate bribery in Mexico? It’s thoroughly integrated into the culture and the economy. The same goes for darker traditions. A Westernized Sudanese couple I know shrug at the continuing slavery in their country. It’s always existed, they say, and always will. 

AS: Theo, the American Doctor, what is his role I the story—do you feel he is the participant-observer to help readers make sense of a new culture or just another person to add more cultural differences to the mix?

AH: I never thought of him in such a mechanical way. He was always a living, breathing man to me. He and Hanaan were the original two characters in the short story that launched the novel. His genesis is rooted in a story I heard from a Sunni woman I met in Kuwait. She had fallen in love with a Shia man when they both were going to college in London, but her father wouldn’t hear of the romance, threatened to exile her from her extended family, and she gave the man up. Several years later, she still mourned the loss and had never married despite considerable pressure to do so. In my naïveté about the deep divides of Islam, I found this outrageous, which amused her, I think. She educated me a little and we talked about relative transgressions for women in her position. Falling in love with someone like Theo would have been far worse, a non-Muslim, non-Arab, non-religious Westerner. 

AS: Why is Kit so unwilling to hire a servant? Is she naïve or just wanting to keep her Americanism about her? Particularly that shopping scene where she embarrasses Mufeeda by treating Brazio as a peer.

AH: Kit comes from a white, working-class family in Oklahoma that has never known wealth. Her ancestors were dirt-poor Sooners, and the family lives on what had been a farm in better times. Her father now sells farming equipment. She’s never known anyone who employs domestic servants and the idea is foreign to her and a little repugnant, as if having a servant implies she’s not capable of doing the work herself. In her world back home, everyone is basically equal. For her to ignore Mufeeda’s servant Brazio in the souk, when he’s standing right next to her, would seem both rude and prejudiced, like intentionally overlooking one of her father’s seasonal employees because he happens to be African American.

AS: The Honor Code is so disturbing and arcane. I cannot believe it still exists. Why is it so persistent even in seemingly “progressive” Muslim countries?

AH: World wide, honor killing isn’t rare, and Western history isn’t innocent of the practice, either. As far as I know, it’s relatively rare in Kuwait and is thought repellent by most Kuwaitis, but it hasn’t been wiped out. It’s linked with societies that have strong communal traditions, where the idea of individuality holds less sway. Arranged marriage is one manifestation of communal tradition, and it’s still routine in places such as the Middle East and South Asia. A woman marries the man her family chooses, for the good of the family and its connections. When she refuses to obey this tradition, or she flaunts an independence her family doesn’t recognize, she brings disgrace down on the whole clan.

AS: Wonderful writing and riveting story. I don’t want to give away anything. Thank you so much for taking all these questions.

review source: The Permanent Press

, , , ,

1 Comment