Grace: DVD review

October 30, 2009

Grace is not a film where there’s tons of blood and gore for no reason. It’s not that type of horror film. This one is much more cerebral. Grace is creepy. It’s also feminist to its core. Although written and directed by a man, Paul Solet, Grace manages to tap into women’s issues. It hones in on a woman’s bond with a child. How far is a woman willing to challenge morality to provide her baby with the most basic of needs: food, shelter and safety?

For a long time, new-agey vegan and women’s studies graduate Madeline [Jordan Ladd] and her husband Michael [Stephen Park] have been trying to have a child and finally Madeline gets pregnant. Everything seems to be going quite well although Michael’s mother does not approve of the choice of a midwife for the birth and giving birth in a birthing pool instead of at a hospital. The midwife is actually Madeline’s former professor and lover. After a terrible accident, both her husband and the fetus she’s carrying die. She, however, decides to carry the baby to term. After the stillborn birth, the baby suddenly comes back to life. She names her Grace. Nothing terribly bizarre happens to Grace. She just has an insatiable appetite . . . for blood. Thus the creepiness ensues. Bugs are drawn to her. The cat is overly protective of the baby. And when Madeline breastfeeds Grace it is the ultimate horror show. A complete nightmare. In the end, though, Madeline will go to any means necessary to give her baby what she needs and to hide this fact from her mother-in-law and any one else who would take her child away from her. Ladd is excellent in her transformation from the easy-going, hippie chick to the anemic, obsessed, and unwaveringly devoted mother.

Grace is truly disturbing and will make you think for days after you watch it.

GRADE: B+


YOU BETTER NOT CRY: book review

October 27, 2009

BetterNotCryIf you have to be single and you have to be bitter and you also have to be without family for the holidays, Manhattan is the only place to be. And praise Jesus for the Jews, the Chinese, and the alcoholics. If it weren’t for them, I wouldn’t be able to have sex, eat, or forget all the people I’d had sex with.

I really fell for Augusten’s writing with A Wolf at the Table. Maybe because I have an absent father. My mom divorced my father when I was about eight. Several years later my dad basically disappeared into the verdant scum that is Florida. He turned up several years ago but pretty much blew it.

I’m not a fan of holidays and particularly do not like Christmas. So when someone writes stories about the holiday I’m not really thrilled about it but willing to read them if I like the author. YOU BETTER NOT CRY focuses on Christmas-related stories. So for me, they are hit and miss. There are seven stories in the slim green bound book and I particularly liked three.

There’s the absurdity of a young Augusten making a brick-hard gingerbread house from scratch and sans recipe [As for all the spices—cinnamon, cardamom, nutmeg, ginger, fennel—I skipped them all.] in “And Two Eyes Made Out of Coal.”

In “Ask Again Later,” Augusten wakes up in a hotel bed next to a much older French guy dressed as Santa. Did they or didn’t they?, Augusten wonders and immediately rushes to his doctor for every test conceivable. He is then haunted by Santas throughout the Manhattan streets and of course thinks of this kinda creepy Frenchman.

My question was: How did I go from merely seeing the dirty French Santa in a bar to being in his hotel room the next morning? And this presented me with an actual equation. How did one plus one equal old French Santa?

Augusten spends Christmas with his HIV-positive partner in the poignant, wistful and bittersweet “The Best and Only Everything.” Augusten is forthright with details about the initial rush of love and the banality of a relationship. Wanting what you don’t have and then not wanting what you have. We’ve all been there.

George was vertical, not horizontal. All of him was right there from the first moment. He didn’t have “sides”; he had fathoms. If you didn’t know him after one date, you couldn’t know him. In this way, he was a treasure perfectly hidden right before my eyes. He was the wreck of the Sussex in my backyard swimming pool.

I like the darkness in Augusten’s writing. The honesty. The bizarre. The raw. The surprises. He is willing to share intimate moments and thoughts. Of course, that makes or breaks a good memoirist. YOU BETTER NOT CRY might not be the best work by Augusten Burroughs but it will bring a smirk to your face or tear to your eye and that’s what the holidays are all about.

Augusten Burroughs is currently on TOUR.

Title: YOU BETTER NOT CRY: Stories for Christmas
Author: Augusten Burroughs
ISBN: 0-312-42379-9
Pages: 206
Release Date: October 27, 2009
Publisher: St. Martin’s Press
Review source: St. Martin’s Press
Rating: 3/5

–review by Amy Steele


Skeletons at the Feast: book review

October 27, 2009

skeletonsatfeast

 

Title: Skeletons at the Feast

Author: Chris Bohjalian
ISBN: 978-1-84737-314-4
Pages: 363
Release Date: February 10, 2009 (paperback)
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review source: personal copy
Rating: 5/5

 

 

 

Anna understood on a level that was more intellectual than visceral that aging represented a steady winnowing of a life’s possibilities. She grasped death from bullets and bombs and bayonets far better than she did death from old age and cancer. But she was not uncomprehending of the reality that the infinite steadily contracted, the options narrowed, and eventually one’s future would be as shallow as a spoon. As predictable—and enervating—as the mud that followed the first thaws in March. And so as they walked on toward Stettin, three more days beneath a dreary, ever-lowering sky, in her mind she recited a litany of names. Yes, they did get distracted. All of them. They were distracted as much by their memories of what—of whom—they had lost as they were by what loomed before them. Gone, she thought, at least for the moment, was Werner. And disappeared behind him into that great fog of battle were her father and Helmut. Her twin. Then there was her mother’s brother, dead, as well as the obdurate man’s daughter and daughter-in-law and grandson. There were Klara and Gabi, not certainly dead but most likely dead. Russians, two killed in a barn in the midst of an act of inexplicable kindness. No, that wasn’t right: It wasn’t an act of kindness at all. They were stealing everything her family had: They had simply chosen not to rape and murder her in the process. Funny how war altered one’s definition of mercy.

Skeletons at the Feast highlights an aspect of WWII that many people may know little about: when the Third Reich finally was losing ground in Germany, Russian forces started to take over the countryside and people began to flee their homes in an attempt to reach Allied Forces (British and American) across the lines of the Third Reich. Chris Bohjalian depicts the horrors and the disregard for humanity and numerous despicable moments in this unforgettable work of historical fiction. Bohjalian makes the story much more powerful by adding memorable details: soldiers raping, humiliating and killing young girls and babies; a girl at a camp who survives due to the boots her boyfriend gave her before the war; trading family jewelry for beets and potatoes, entire wagons of Jewish prisoners being burned alive, discussions about banned German books, listened to the verboten BBC radio, the Hitler Youth, a woman having her period and having a riding crop forced inside her vagina by an SS guard.

Skeletons at the Feast focuses on the Emmerich family, Prussian aristocrats. 18-year-old Anna is the central figure. Her lover, Callum Finella, is a Scottish prisoner of war, who had been brought to work at her family farm. Her mother Mitti and younger brother Theo join the group that embarks on this bitter winter journey. Uri Singer, a German Jew who escaped from Auschwitz, and has taken the identity of a Wehrmacht corporal joins them on the journey. Skeletons at the Feast painstakingly describes the details of their relationships, struggles, feelings, and reaction to the war-torn countryside.

–review by Amy Steele


Interview: author Chris Bohjalian

October 27, 2009

 Skeletons at the Feast Paperback

The very kind Chris Bohjalian managed to answer some questions via email between radio interviews [he’s currently off on tour].

Amy Steele: You mentioned finding a journal that sparked the idea for Skeletons at the Feast. What interested you about writing a book about WWII?

Chris Bohjalian: I have always loved reading big, sweeping, epic World War II love stories – novels such as Sophie’s Choice, The English Patient, and Atonement. That was one factor.

But there was also this: In the past my novels have had, by design, a ripple of moral ambiguity to them. Not this time: World War II was a conflict without moral ambiguity. There was good and there was evil, and good triumphed. That was a factor that drew me to the subject, too.

Finally, there is the reality that the women and men who survived the Holocaust are now in their 70s, 80s, and 90s. Many of the people I interviewed – the Holocaust survivors and the Germans – were telling their story for one of the last times in their lives.  It was important to me to get their memories down for subsequent generations.

STEELE: It amazes me that there are so many untold stories of WWII still to be told. The Russian invasion of Germany is not talked about often. What do we learn from the past and WWII in particular?

CB: Well, we learned that the Greatest Generation really was pretty great.  That’s one thing.

We also learned that some people’s fortitude and courage and resilience are profound.

But, sadly, we also saw that the human capacity for barbarism is limitless, too. 

And, sadly, as we gaze around the globe and look at the post World War II world – Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur – we just don’t seem to be evolving in that regard.

STEELE: It’s such a difficult subject and you add all these crucially integral details: the basic disregard for humanity—raping young girls/pillaging, Uri who steals SS officer’s identity, discussion of literature/ listening to the BBC, the Hitler youth, Cecile in the camp, the friends who are so verbal in hatred of the Jews… How much research goes into a novel like this? Do you research before you write or as you go?

CB: I do an enormous amount of research, both before writing and as I am writing.

And I do all of my interviewing myself. In this case, that was especially important. I wanted to hear firsthand the stories of the Survivors and the stories of the German refugees.  There is often an inflection in an answer or a small gesture that teaches a person more than a transcript of an interview.  Moreover, by doing the interviews myself I have the chance to ask follow-up questions I might not have thought of, and to explore avenues I hadn’t anticipated.

 

chris_bohjalian

STEELE: What is most important to you when writing a novel?

CB: Giving readers a good story – one that makes them really want to keep turning the pages.

STEELE: What is your favorite aspect of this story?

CB: This novel has some of my favorite characters – people like Anna and Cecile and Uri and Theo.  This is the first time I have finished writing a book and been sad that it was done.  I missed those characters and wanted to spend more time with them.

And, of course, I always think of the extraordinary people I met in my research, and my friend’s mother – the diarist’s daughter.  She was a 16-year-old when she and her family made that unbelievably arduous trek west across Poland and Germany in 1945.  She’s a remarkable woman.

STEELE: You have a beautiful old house in Burlington, Vermont which seems like an idyllic setting in which to create novels. Why do you like living there and how has it affected your writing?

CB: Actually, I have a beautiful old house an hour from Burlington. I live in a village of barely a thousand people halfway up Vermont’s third highest mountain.

Writers talk with an agonizing amount of hubris about finding their voice. I found my voice in rural Vermont. I never would have written books such as Midwives or The Double Bind had I not moved there.

And while I might have written a World War II love story, it wouldn’t have been Skeletons at the Feast because I wouldn’t have become friends with a wonderful guy (and his family) whose mother and grandmother made that long walk across Europe, and whose grandmother kept a diary.

STEELE: You’ve written novels about vastly different topics. How are you able to switch from one to another? What do you do for down time between novels?

CB: There is no down time between novels.  I finish one and embark on the next.  Really, I write every day, and I have to write something.

STEELE: Why do you write?

CB: The mortgage. 

I’m kidding – sort of.  There is a certain artistic passion that drives any novelist or poet (recall Rilke’s inspiring words on this subject), but it is also a lovely way to make a living. 

STEELE: What is the greatest challenge of being a novelist?

CB: In my case, it is battling back an ever present inferiority complex – that sense of my own mediocrity.  Every month I seem to read a novel that is better than anything I will ever write in my life.

STEELE: What is in your to-be-read pile?

CS: A forthcoming collection of short stories by Jabari Asim, A Taste of Honey, and Audrey Niffengger’s Her Fearful Symmetry

STEELE: What advice do you give to someone who wants to start a novel and just cannot start writing?

CS: Aspiring writers can find my thoughts on this at length on my blog

STEELE: Where do most of your ideas come from?

CS: Usually from people I meet.  They tell me a story or show me a photo or ask me to look at a diary – and I am off and running.

 STEELE: Your publicist sent me an ARC of Secrets of Eden– another topical and potent subject—domestic violence. Cannot wait to read this one. How did this novel come about?

CS: Thank you.  Secrets of Eden is a literary thriller in the tradition of The Double Bind and Midwives.  It’s about a domestic abuse murder-suicide with a twist; it seems the husband did not shoot himself after he strangled his wife, as everyone initially assumed.  Someone else shot him. 

The idea grew from the stories women told me after The Double Bind was published.  The reality is that violence against women in this country is absolutely epidemic.

Chris Bohjalian will be  at the Concord Festival of Authors Breakfast with the Authors on November 7.


Interview: Project Runway designer Christopher Straub

October 27, 2009

proje4211

Season 6 of Project Runway takes place in Los Angeles. Hosted by Heidi Klum, with mentor Tim Gunn and judges Michael Kors (leading fashion designer) and Nina Garcia (fashion director of Marie Claire magazine). The designers use workspaces at Los Angeles’ Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising (FIDM).  Finalists will show their own lines in front of an audience of fashion industry insiders at New York Fashion Week. 

PROJECT RUNWAY: SEASON 6 started with 16 Designers and this week it is down to six:

Althea Harper (24) -Brooklyn, NY [hometown: Dayton, OH]

Carol Hannah Whitfield (24) -Brooklyn, NY [hometown: Anderson, SC]

Gordana Gehlhausen (45) -San Diego, CA [native of former Yugoslavia]

Irina Shabayeva (27) -New York, NY [native of Republic of Georgia]

Logan Neitzel (26) -Seattle, WA [hometown: Blackfoot, ID]

Christopher Straub (30) -Shakopee, MN [hometown: St. Louis Park, MN]

I spoke with the energetic, sweet, and very positive Christopher Straub by phone on Monday.

christopherPR

Christopher Straub at his work station/ PR

STEELE: I want to talk about the last challenge. I know you’re all done wrapping. Oh what was it called?

 

CHRISTOPHER STRAUB [CS]: Around the World in Two Days–I think that was the name of the challenge.

STEELE: The things that motivate you although it was the things that motivate or inspired Michael Kors more. What did you think when they said that these are places that he likes to go and travel to and they might be places you’ve never been to?

CS: I really can get my inspiration from anything. Whether it’s the smallest thing like a location or a fabric. I had no problem taking a photograph of Santa Fe and designing what I thought that woman in that temperature, in that climate would wear. And so I had a lot of fun with it.

STEELE: But they said no one there would wear what you ended up designing. I thought it was really cute.

proje4220

Matar models design by Christopher Straub

CS: You never know what the judges are going to be looking for at that moment. I did what I did. I did what I thought was right. Sometimes the judges don’t get it. Sometimes you don’t get a chance to explain what you were really going for. I took my inspiration from the photograph and the colors and the landscapes and I don’t know anyone from Santa Fe and I’ve never been to Santa Fe. So I had to use all my own references to create a look that I thought was appropriate for the challenge.

STEELE: I watch Project Runway with my mother every week [writer’s note: is that pathetic of me to admit or nice that I spend quality time with my mom] and whenever you guys are at MOOD my mother says [and I use my mom voice]: “They never have enough time. They seem so rushed.” So is it the way that it looks or at the beginning are you allowed to get familiar with the store? Do you know what’s where?

CS: I don’t remember ever getting a tour of the store saying, “These fabrics are in this section.” but there are signs that say Organza or silk so sometimes if you know what you’re looking for you can look in those sections. But there’s never enough time. If you came to me and said “Let’s design an outfit for me,” you would never take a half an hour just to pick out fabric. That’s a huge part of the challenge. If you don’t find what you’re looking for, you have to make a concession at that moment to pick something that’s going to work for you and work for your garment. Otherwise you have to change your plan right away if you don’t find the right fabric.

I’ve had to do that a few times where the initial garment wasn’t the fabric or color I was looking for. A good example was the first challenge. That dress was actually supposed to be orange and white and it ended up being gray and black. So it’s all about whatever fabrications you can find in that small, small timeframe. Especially if you are looking for several different materials because it’s what is going to work and what is going to go together.

STEELE: And when you sketch are you also thinking what kinds of fabrics you are using?

CS: Yeah. I remember going one time to MOOD and thinking, “I like this fabric. I should try to find a way to work that in to the next challenge. But you forget that fabric by the time you get to the next challenge. I remember thinking that I wanted a leg up and to be inspired by the fabric but you never know what the challenge is going to be. You never know if that white fabric with the pink orchids is going to work.  You can never get exactly what you have in your head but you can usually get pretty close. There’s a lot of stuff.

STEELE: What do you think is the best part of being on Project Runway?

CS: For me, it’s the relationship part of it. I love meeting people. I think that the bonding experience with those 15 people, some more than others, no one is going to be able to share that with me. I’m really good friends with Carol Hannah and Ramon-Lawrence and only they know the intensity and that odd boiling pot that we had to know each other in. Because in one respect, you have to have people around you that support you and in another respect, that’s your competition. Those are the people that are keeping you from being in the number one spot.

It was a once in a lifetime opportunity for me.

STEELE: How much interaction do you have with the models and especially with the spin-off show [Models of the Runway], how does that affect your designs?

CS: I think for me the model did not have a huge effect on my designs. Of course you like to work with a model that you know you’re comfortable with and you know their sizing and all that stuff. Models are really good transformers. If you want them to have a natural sun-kissed look or you want them to have a Goth look, they usually can get into those roles. I never had a problem. In this last challenge, when I had Santa Fe, Matar was the perfect model for that because she already has that bronzed skin and that beautiful wavy hair and highlights of gold and brown. It was perfect for my design.

STEELE: I would think most models are built like racks that you can just hang clothes on pretty much.

CS: Yeah. The thinner the model, the more beautiful your stuff looks sometimes.

STEELE: Kojii– I really like her look. I wondered why she said she had a hard look to work with because she’s pale and has dark hair. She’s the skinniest of all the models and she has a daughter!

CS: Oh, by far. By far! That was a hesitation with picking her because I had seen when a designer would make a garment for her specifically and put it on the bust for her it would have a six inch gap from the shoulders all the way to the bottom. It couldn’t close on our forms at all. Typically there will be some odd measurements here and there. But Kojii was literally six inches less than every measurement and it was difficult to make clothing for her. You couldn’t do any draping because you would literally have to custom make it for her body.

STEELE: So there are three episodes left and you’ve been either in the top three or the bottom three. I have to ask you about it.

CS: [laughing…] I was getting a lot of visibility. I went onto the show never, ever, ever wanting to play it safe. I always wanted to push the envelope whether it be good or whether it be bad. Sometimes it’s praised like the first challenge and sometimes it’s not so praised. But this is what I do. I’m an artist. I never went to school and I never got the critiques from the instructors. So this is all a new world. I’ve never had boundaries. It’s difficult for someone to say your ART is good or bad. I’ve never had it put in that perspective. Someone’s going to be telling you you’re good or you’re not so good. And it’s completely subjective.

On the first challenge: I won it, but I still got some people saying, “I hate your dress.” And then other times when I’m almost going home people will say, “I’m surprised you didn’t win.” There’s always going to be someone who’s going to love and hate everything you do. So I don’t really take it personally. At all. I’d rather be in the bottom three, then safe. At least I get to talk about my design, my point of view and my story behind it.

STEELE: At the beginning you seemed really paranoid that everyone else had all this training that you didn’t have. You’re very hard on yourself. I’m like that too. We are all our own worst critics. You’re constantly comparing yourself to other designers. Of course, it is a competition. I was trying to think of a way to phrase this question. Obviously you are on a show where you are competing with other designers, so I’m just wondering WHY you feel that way.

CS_PRDRESS

Katie models design by Christopher Straub

CS: I guess the best word is just HUMBLE. I’m so happy to be a part of it. That everyone at home can see my point of view and my story. I just wanted to be able to compete. I didn’t necessarily go in it to win it. It was a great opportunity to share my story and share my point of view. I didn’t want to make enemies. I didn’t want to be arrogant or cocky in any way. I wanted to be the BEST ME.

STEELE: You come in and you already have your own sense of style and your own way of doing things but do you learn things and take things away from the show?

CS: Absolutely. Some stuff I had done on the show I had never done before. And what a weird time to try something new but some of the things I did on the show I used after that. I learned what I was capable of doing.  Up until the show I’d never put 20 hours into a dress and all of a sudden when you have a two-day challenge, you find out what can you do in 20 hours versus five hours. I now know I’m capable of doing some high art pieces.

STEELE: So you live in Minnesota still?

CS: Yes, I do.

STEELE: How’s the fashion there?

CS: The Twin Cities is in no means a fashion Mecca. There’s a lot of talent around here though.

STEELE: It’s cold! A lot of UGG boots.

CS: A lot of Columbia jackets. All the girls wear skimpy outfits but put huge parkas on over them. It’s so funny.

I’m getting a lot more aware of the Minneapolis fashion culture. Just now I’m getting taken in by that community so that’s fun too.

STEELE: Good luck with the rest of the episodes. Thank  you for talking to me.

CS: Happy to.


BAD LIEUTENANT: new music from New Order’s Bernard Sumner

October 26, 2009

bad-lieutenant-logo

BAD LIEUTENANT: Never Cry Another Tear

My initial take: There’s a newness yet I feel nostalgic. It’s haunting and soothing. Full of 90s sensibilities but with an edginess that brings it to the NOW. I adored New Order like many 90s-era alternachicks [and guys].

**new project from Joy Division/New Order‘s Bernard Sumner (guitar, vocals) with Phil Cunningham (guitars) and new UK “find” Jake Evans (vocals, guitars). Former Joy Division/New Order drummer Stephen Morris played on the album and will also be on tour along with bassist Tom Champman.

Bernard Sumner and members of Bad Lieutenant

Bernard Sumner and members of Bad Lieutenant

U.S. concert dates
Wednesday, November 18 at the Park West–Chicago
Saturday, November 21 at Webster Hall–New York
tickets available at TICKETMASTER

Never Cry Another Tear is available exclusively at Amazon.
Beginning November 10 available through all other retail outlets via a partnership with Original Signal Recordings.

New Order, born from the ashes of the near-mythic English band Joy Division, was one of the most innovative and critically-acclaimed bands of the 1980s, embracing the electronic textures and dance rhythms of the underground club culture while maintaining a mysterious and distant image. The group’s pioneering fusion of modern aesthetics and dance music successfully bridged the gap between the two worlds, creating a distinctively thoughtful and oblique brand of pop. Between 1981 and 2005, New Order released eight studio albums, sold millions of albums worldwide and amassed Gold and Platinum awards. In addition, the band’s single “Blue Monday” bears the distinction of being the biggest-selling 12-inch of all time, having sold in excess of 3-million copies.


Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs– DVD review

October 26, 2009

IceAge3Title: Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
Director: Carlos Saldanha
Mike Thurmeier
Starring: John Leguizamo, Denis Leary, Ray Romano, Queen Latifah
Running time: 94 min.
Release date: October 27, 2009
MPAA: Rated PG for some mild rude humor and peril.
Film Company: Twentieth Century Fox
Review source: Click Communications
Rating: C

Diego [Denis Leary] is grumpy because Manny [Ray Romano is becoming a “family guy” and having a baby with Ellie [Queen Latifah has the best lines in the entire movie]. Sid [John Leguizamo] adopts and nurtures three dinosaur eggs in an attempt to bond with Manny and Ellie. When the eggs hatch, the mother returns for her offspring and takes Sid back to her home. Manny, Ellie and Diego [Denis Leary] set off to rescue their friend from uncertain doom. They meet Buck [Simon Pegg], a one-eyed weasel who hunts dinosaurs. And also Scrat [Chris Wedge] is along for the ride again. Isn’t this supposed to be light-hearted fun? I didn’t laugh at all. The characters are caricatures. The dinosaur animation is decent but it’s tough to personify dinosaurs in the way that the other animals have been turned “fun” and “lovable.” Other than the babies, the dinosaurs are mostly scary looking. Instead of a lesson in global changes, natural selection and/or species extinction, Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs is a long joke that falls through thin ice.

DVD Extras: Scrat shorts are worth watching—he was the highlight of the Ice Age preview for me—everything else is unremarkable including Walk the Dinosaur music video, behind-the-scenes with Ray Romano, Queen Latifah and John Leguizamo, and director commentary


White Collar: tv review

October 25, 2009

WhiteCollarposter
Do we need another show about con artists? At first glance, White Collar has a similar style to Burn Notice [USA] and Leverage [TNT] with its funky music and editing style–stopping film to provide names and titles of people. Neal Caffrey [Matt Bomer] is a charmer. He’s a grifter, dreamer, high roller and flashy sort of guy. He’s a master forger and art thief and has committed a number of other white collar crimes that put him in prison. Peter Burke [Tim DeKay] is the Company Man [a “working guy…not cappuccino in the clouds.”] He works for the FBI. He’s constantly asking his FBI colleagues: “Do any of you Harvard grads know…?” or “How many of you went to Harvard?” What is the hang-up, dude? Tiffani Thiessen [What About Brian?, Beverly Hills 90210] plays Burke’s wife Elizabeth. She’s supportive and smart but we don’t know much else about her yet. I didn’t see any chemistry between the two but I definitely saw the chemistry between Elizabeth and Caffrey in one brief scene. Then there’s Burke’s “probie” Diana [Marsha Thomason]. The only thing we find out about her this episode is that “she’d rather be wearing the hat.” Really, writers? What is this lame lesbian innuendo? Then after Caffrey watches her flirt with a female security guard with a strange look on his face, he says to Burke, “I thought you had a policy?” Burke replies: “That’s the military. Don’t ask. Don’t care.” UGH. Leave it out of this. If Diana were straight this would not have been a conversation at all.

whiteCollarpilot
White Collar has amusing moments but how original is the concept of the con artist going “straight” to help the good guys/ the Feds? Caffrey is a felon who has information that the feds are unable to get for themselves. How does he get it when he’s been in prison for four years? Burke was working a case when he got called because Caffrey had broken out of jail to go after his girlfriend Kate. After Caffrey picks a fiber off of Burke’s blazer and tells him it is from the security of a Canadian $100 bill. [Here they play it way safe by picking Canada], Burke makes a deal to work with Caffrey to keep him out of jail. Caffrey is now going to help the FBI to solve cases. Caffrey and Peter have this brotherly/jokey/competitive relationship. White Collar isn’t all that exciting case-wise. I didn’t care whether or not the case got solved. The relationship between Caffrey and Burke differentiates White Collar from other con-artist-working-for-the-greater-good shows and might make it worthwhile viewing.


FEMINISTA: book review

October 25, 2009

FeministaTitle: FEMINISTA
Author: Erica Kennedy
ISBN: 978-0-312-53879-8
Pages: 358
Release Date: September 1, 2009
Publisher: St. Martin’s
Review source: publisher
Rating: 4/5

Sydney would never be a real success in her mother’s eyes as long as her ring finger was bare, but that was Vera’s hang-up, not hers. Marriage was not an accomplishment. When were women (most of whom felt that way, whether they’d cop to it or not) going to get that through their heads? Crossing the finish line in a marathon. Becoming a cardiothoracic surgeon. Winning an Oscar. Those were accomplishments. Getting married was just a (hopefully) happy fact of life.
Ditto for having kids. There was no achievement in doing what any menstruating teenager could do. The achievement was in being a good parent, and just because every parent wanted to think he or she was didn’t make it true.

FEMINISTA is smart fun. Erica Kennedy [Bling] turned out a feverish bitch lit novel with an astounding eye for the often ridiculousness aspects of social-climbing, societal expectations and prosperity. The central figure 33-year-old Sydney Zamora defies most friendly “chick lit” classifications. Sydney is outspoken, hard-working and independent and rocks the combat boots. She’s also a bit pissed off at everything. She literally says whatever is on her mind with little editing. Yes, it can get her into trouble. She despises trust fund kids that only party and those that have no intention to ever do any charity work. She doesn’t blindly follow popular trends. This lovely, sassy biracial Manhattan celebrity journalist earns a fantastic salary for glossy magazine Cachet and works very few hours per week. But while Sydney has an enviable life on paper and seemingly at first glance, is she truly happy?

Sydney’s progressive lesbian sister—a suburban mother and half of a power couple—gives her a birthday present that horrifies Sydney: the services of exclusive matchmaker Mitzi Berman. But is the joke on Sydney when she becomes one of Mitzi’s most difficult and nearly “unmatchable” clients? Sydney has typically dated [short-term] rocker/slacker-types. Haven’t we all? There’s something about a guy up on stage with a guitar.  In the midst of all this is Max Cooper, the heir to a hugely popular department store [Sure, he wanted to do something with his life, but that something would be his passion, not his profession.] Max [who happens to play bass in a band] meets Sydney and she thinks he’s a doorman. Though attracted to Max she thinks it’s time to get more serious with her personal life. While Sydney has reached professional success, her personal life is not where she expected it to be.

Why do women have to sacrifice one for the other? Why can’t women have both great careers and great personal lives? Is it possible? Will powerful female executives with families ever NOT be asked how they manage to “balance” it all? Will single women over 30 ever stop being asked if they have plans to “settle down?” Will society stop looking at single women over 35 as anomalies, circus freak shows, as something is wrong with these women? In FEMINISTA Kennedy manages to delve into such multi-faceted issues with adept style, wit and an innate knowledge of what motivates and infuriates today’s women.


Q&A: author Dick Lehr, THE FENCE

October 23, 2009
pic from author's web site

pic from author's web site

A professor of journalism and co-director of an investigative reporting clinic at Boston University, Dick Lehr, an attorney, also works for the Boston Globe where he was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in investigative reporting. Lehr co-authored the New York Times bestseller, Black Mass: The Irish Mob, The FBI, and a Devil’s Deal, which won the 2001 Edgar Award for Best Fact Crime book. A film based on the book, directed by Jim Sheridan [In America, In the Name of the Father] is currently in production.

Lehr is also co-author of Judgment Ridge: the True Story of the Dartmouth Murders, which was a finalist in the 2003 Edgar Awards for Best Fact Crime book, and The Underboss: The Rise and Fall of a Mafia Family.

TheFence

Title: The Fence
Author: Dick Lehr
ISBN: 978-0060780982
Pages: 400
Release Date: June 23, 2009
Publisher: Harper
 

The Fence, Lehr’s most recent book, is about a police cover up along racial divides and among its own ranks. In 1995, Michael Cox, an African American plainclothes officer, was brutally beaten by his fellow police officers after he was mistaken for a murder suspect. During the attack on Cox, Kenny Conley—an Irish American officer from South Boston—was chasing down the actual murder suspect. After the incident, Cox waited weeks for reparation from the Boston Police Department and federal authorities. Instead he faced lies and road blocks. Lehr exhaustively delved into the issue, interviewing Michael Cox, Kenny Conley, and others involved at the time.

Steele: Massachusetts is known as the bluest of the blue states. How can Boston be so racially divided?

Lehr: Boston is not exempt from the same historical racial divisions that are part of American life, in US cities everywhere, but especially in older cities like Boston where neighborhood and ethnic identities run so deep.

Steele: How did you become interested in this story?

Lehr: As a reporter at the Boston Globe, I began writing about the Cox case in connection with a year-long investigative series about corruption in the Boston Police Department.

Steele: Why did you decide to write this book?

Lehr: For many reasons. The drama of the police chase, the horror of the beating, and the fact cops left one of their own bleeding on the ground were jaw-dropping. Being fascinated with the blue wall of silence and a police culture of cover-up of wrongdoing, I saw this quintessential case through which to examine those issue – which, by the way, are hardly unique to Boston but are part of policing everywhere.

Steele: Are you particularly interested in Irish-Catholic Boston [Black Mass] or is that just a coincidence?

Lehr: Coincidence. I’m interested in Boston, present and past.

Steele: How does being an attorney influence your investigative journalism?

Lehr: It’s helped in terms of research, knowing my way around the courts and with legal procedure.

Steele: You write about very sensitive topics. What is the biggest challenge in investigating the stories? How do you get people to talk to you?

Lehr: The biggest challenge? Getting the information – the documentation – to tell the story in a dramatic narrative, which is my goal, to write the story so that it reads like a novel even though it’s fact-based, as a the best way to get at the underlying issues and themes. There’s no one way to get people talking. Sometimes it’s a call; other times it is having someone call in your behalf, as a sponsor of sorts; sometimes it’s a letter; sometimes it’s a knock on the door; and sometimes nothing works.

Steele: When was the investigative reporting clinic at BU established? Can you give me more details about it? [I attended the University of Maryland from 1993-1994 and took a computer-assisted-reporting class [with Bill Dedman] which was considered cutting-edge. Then I finished my master’s degree at Boston University in 1995.]

Lehr: With a colleague, I started the clinic my first year of teaching at BU, in 2003-2004. It’s a graduate-level course where students work on real stories, or at least investigate tips, and if they pan out then we see it through to publication. Our stories have run in the Boston Globe and the Boston Phoenix.

More recently, the Journalism Department is now home base for the new New England Center for Investigative Reporting (NECIR). People can find out about through the Journalism Department’s website.

Steele: What do you tell your journalism students now as newspapers are dissolving and the face of reporting is rapidly changing?

Lehr: We’re in the midst of a huge paradigm, and it’s not clear how it’s going to look when it’s over, but I believe there will always a be a need and demand for trained journalists – people who know how to report, validate and write and tell a compelling account of events unfolding in the world around us.

Steele: I look forward to meeting you in person on Monday night.

Lehr: Sounds great.

Dick Lehr will be speaking on the Conversations About Race panel– Monday, October 26 at 7:30 p.m. as part of The Concord Festival of Authors.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,891 other followers