Jane Green Q&A

July 13, 2007

Recently I read Jane Green’s latest novel Second Chance in which she follows a group of friends after a tragedy. These are friends who have not seen each other in a decade, in most cases, but fall back into the easy rapport of past times when they reconnect. The death of Tom bonds them and keeps them moving forward with his memory strong in their heads and hearts. Green examines grief, loss and transition with wit and genuine characters. She always creates the type of characters to which one can relate on at least one level. There’s the couple who cannot conceive and desperately desire a child, the alcoholic film star, the single woman who finds herself unexpectedly pregnant and the woman who embarks on an affair to free herself from a marriage that has been over for years. Second Chance is a satisfying, easy summer read.

I conducted this interview via email which is unusual, rare and needless to say, not my favorite mode of interviewing [in person, then phone, and as a last resort, feeding questions through a publicist]. I’ve done it a few times. I find it strange that Ms. Green would not comment on the fact that I lived in her current hometown of Westport, Conn., that I too am a journalist and that my brother lives in that area and has four children, including twin boys, just like her.

Amy Steele [AS]: Jane, We have a few things in common: though you are successful and I am not quite yet. We are the same age. I lived in Westport, Conn. until my parents’ divorce when I was 8 years-old. I live in Boston now and grew up in a suburb outside Boston -my mom re-married about four years after her divorce. My brother lives in the Westport area and has four children, including a set of twins. I have a master’s in journalism and am trying to write a book-I just do not know whether to go the fiction or non-fiction route.

AS: How did you make the transition from journalist to fiction writer?
Jane Green: With a whole lot of nerve. The part of journalism I enjoyed the most was always the writing, and the discipline of journalism served, and
continues to serve me, incredibly well, but I left my job with just
enough money to get by for a few months, and sat down to write Straight
Talking. Within three months there was a bidding war and I signed a two
book deal.

AS: When did you realize that is would be possible to have a career as
an author?
JG: As soon as the first bid came in, which was about twice my
annual salary!

AS: Why do you tell stories?

JG: Because I can, because I enjoy it, because
I love making a difference in people’s lives. The earlier novels were
pure entertainment, but as I’ve grown and changed, I think the books
carry a message that I hope resonates with my readers.

AS: What do you want readers to take from Second Chance?

JG: That we only get one shot, and that if ever we are stuck, far better to take a deep breath and a step in a different direction, and that it is never too
late to redefine our lives and ourselves, to go out and find true happiness. [AS: We only get ONE shot but we can take a different direction? Isn’t that contradictory?]

AS: What is the most difficult aspect of writing?

JG: Discipline. As a single mother of four running the lives of small children, operating a household, having a career, there are always a million other things to be done, and it’s always so hard to focus solely on the writing.
[AS: I’m sure my sister-in-law would love to have play dates!]

AS: What is the most rewarding aspect of writing books?

JG: Going out on the road and meeting the readers, hearing their stories, and receiving their emails, all of which I read, even though I’m not able to respond personally anymore.

AS: When is your favorite time/best time to write?

JG: Mornings only, from my local library, and then it’s back home to be Mom.

AS: How do you get your ideas? Do characters or story ideas come first?

JG: A general theme or idea is always the first thing for me, and then the
characters. I never outline in detail because too often the characters
dictate the story, and they take it in all sorts of unexpected
directions.

AS: With Second Chance, I imagine there’s a bit of you in each
character, based on your experiences. How much of yourself do you put
inyour characters?

JG: A huge amount, but almost always unconsciously. I am
always stunned afterwards when friends tell me how much of me they see,
but when I go back and re-read, I usually see what they are talking
about. It’s very difficult to write what I’m writing, and the sorts of
emotions I’m writing about without having lived it. Having said that,
none of the books are about me, and none of them are my story – I am
just able to draw on my life experience.

AS: Why did you decide to focus on grief and loss?

JG: I lost a friend in the Tsunami and was utterly blindsided by the grief I felt, and as a writer the best way I know to process anything is by sitting down and writing about it. [AS: writing can be rather cathartic]

AS: What influence did your own divorce have on this book and on your
writing?

JG: A huge amount. Holly and Marcus came in after my husband and I
had separated, and I was able to use the writing experience as a way to
fully understand what I was going through and how I was feeling. My
editor didn’t want me to write about my divorce, she felt it would be
too raw and too angry, but in fact, although Holly’s story isn’t mine,
I was able to write about an unhappy marriage and a separation with, I
hope, understanding and empathy.

AS: What does it mean for you to be part of the “chick lit” phenomenon/
genre?

JG: On one hand I am proud to be one of the founders of chick lit,
although I think there is a terrible misconception of what the genre is
- too many people think that it is always a frothy light tale of a
twenty something single girl looking for Mr. Right, when in fact I would
argue it’s simply commercial women’s fiction that is an accurate
reflection of the lives real women are living today, whether they are
in their twenties, thirties, forties or older. What is difficult is the
younger women who loved Jemima J and Mr Maybe now pick up the more
recent books and feel betrayed that, in their eyes, I’m no longer
writing chick lit. My writing reflects my life and the lives of those
around me, and will continue to grow, change and evolve the older I
get.


Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: Film Review

July 11, 2007

Just because you’re allowed to use magic doesn’t mean you have to whip your wands out for everything.–Mrs. Weasley

As Harry Potter grows up, he’s become more serious and the latest film reflects that darker tone. The result is less magic, brightness and fewer surprises. In his fifth year at Hogwarts, Harry tackles inner demons and those who are out to take him town. No doubt #5 will prove to be a blockbuster and a winner among Pott-heads all about the Globe. Turning a 900 page book into a film provides numerous challenges. The thing of it is: it really only appeals to those who have been following the story all along. It’s quite difficult to drop in to this Harry Potter film and feel comfortable with the characters and the storylines.

This time around there’s less character development, too many predictable magical jokes and mishaps. As Harry, Daniel Radcliffe has grown along with the character. The boyishness works for the bewildering moments, his adolescent awkwardness makes the character level and approachable and his expressive facial expressions show the fear, wonder and heartache of Harry. There’s tragedy behind every moment for Harry but he builds strength from it. He is the every-boy hero that audiences cheer for to conquer evil.

Unfortunately the nearly three and a half hour film falls flat. I lost interest about an hour in and looked at my watch four or more times [very rare for me and I couldn’t see the time as it was so dark most of the time]. Overall, the darkness of the film makes it too staid and there are few moments of light and excitement as in earlier films. No balls, no celebrations and few magical times.

Hermione [Emma Watson] is the light and charm and shine. She’s the brains of the operation and remains [unintentionally] funny and independent and a fantastic role model for girls [spin off!]. Star power collides in this film. New additions Helena Bonham Carter and Ralph Fiennes as the Darth Vader-esque Voldemort join the rest of the seasoned actors who make up the staff at Hogwarts are back. Emma Thompson has a delightful cameo as the awkward teacher who gets humiliated by the new Master of the Dark Arts teacher [a delightfully twisted and evil Imelda Staunton].

I know my opinion will be highly unpopular, but Harry Potter no longer interests me. I never felt invested in Harry’s welfare or future as in earlier films. It could have been cut some. The film’s soundtrack soars and brings ebullient moments. The special effects are impressive, though no longer a thrill. Order of the Phoenix has a slow start, a muddling middle and then a final charge at the end.


STEELE RECOMMENDATION: UNLESS A RABID FAN, PUT IT ON THE NETFLIX QUEUE.


L’Auberge Espagnole: sweet little film

July 4, 2007

Xavier [Romain Duris], a French graduate student, travels to Spain to live for one year and participate in an intensive Spanish program in this fast-paced, charming film. While there, he lives in a house with people from all different countries [England, Germany, Italy]. Though quite a conservative guy, who has left a long-term girlfriend [Audrey Tatou] at home, this free lifestyle suits Xavier, much to his surprise. He has an affair, his closest housemate is a lesbian and he most importanly finds out what makes him truly happy. The bonds he develops with his housemates solidify his choices while there. It’s a year that forever changes him, as cliche as that sounds. The film style is fresh and original. Barcelona is bright, expansive and vibrant: the perfect place for self-examination and growth.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,820 other followers